Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 88-2710.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1434, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 360, § 1.)
- Individual was not permitted pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 9-15-2(d) to file a pro se civil complaint related to the final disposition of a family member's remains because no applicable legal authority recognized any private right of action based on alleged violations of O.C.G.A. § 31-21-44, a criminal statute relating to the disposition of human remains. Verdi v. Wilkinson County, 288 Ga. App. 856, 655 S.E.2d 642 (2007), cert. denied, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 397 (Ga. 2008).
In a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit, a Native American plaintiff failed to state a claim against a city and a private developer for disturbing graves because O.C.G.A. § 31-21-44 criminalized the destruction of graves but did not create a private cause of action. Serpentfoot v. Rome City Comm'n, F.3d (11th Cir. Apr. 7, 2009)(Unpublished).
- 22A Am. Jur. 2d, Dead Bodies, § 78.
- 25A C.J.S., Dead Bodies, § 27 et seq.
- Liability for desecration of graves and tombstones, 77 A.L.R.4th 108.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-06-28
Citation: 697 S.E.2d 166, 287 Ga. 448, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2051, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 478
Snippet: disturb human remains. See id. at 857-858; OCGA § 31-21-44. The Court of Appeals held “[tjhere is no indication