O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 31-28-7 (2019)

Penalty

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person, firm, or corporation operating a tourist court without a valid permit shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

History

Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 475, § 8; Code 1933, § 88-1107, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, p. 499, § 1.

TOURIST COURTS

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 53A Am. Jur. 2d, Mobile Homes and Trailer Parks, §§ 21, 22, 30.

CHAPTER 29 COMPENSATION OF EMPLOYEES OF STATE INSTITUTIONS WHO CONTRACT TUBERCULOSIS OR INFECTIOUS HEPATITIS Sec.

Amount of compensation. Physical examination required for compensation under Code Section 31-29-1. Periodic physical examinations of persons receiving compensation. Effect of retirement under Chapter 2 of Title 47. Contributions to retirement system where employee does not retire.

Sec.

Rights of employees under State Personnel Administration. Rules and regulations of employing authority; exclusion from right to compensation of employees not subject to exposure. Specific inclusion of employees of certain institutions.

Cross references. - Workers’ compensation generally, T. 34, C. 9.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1998–1998 · leading case: SAI Enter., Inc. v. Martin-Brower Co., 16 F. Supp. 2d 1381 (N.D. Ga. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

SAI Enter., Inc. v. Martin-Brower Co., 16 F. Supp. 2d 1381 (N.D. Ga. 1998). · cites it 4× “This Code Section provides, in part, “any person, firm or corporation operating a tourist court without a valid permit shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,” O.C.G.A. § 31-28-7 does not support Defendant’s construction of O.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.