Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §31-6-21, enacted by Ga. L. 1983, p. 1566, § 1; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 31; Ga. L. 1985, p. 829, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 6, § 31; Ga. L. 1994, p. 684, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 296, §§ 6, 22; Ga. L. 2007, p. 173, § 2C/HB 429; Ga. L. 2008, p. 12, § 1-1/SB 433; Ga. L. 2009, p. 8, § 31/SB 46; Ga. L. 2009, p. 453, § 1-8/HB 228.)
- Ga. L. 2008, p. 12, § 3-1/SB 433, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to this Code section shall only apply to applications submitted on or after July 1, 2008.
- Section 1122 of the federal Social Security Act of 1935, as amended, referred to in paragraph (11), is codified as 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-1.
- Review Board could use not only the considerations listed in O.C.G.A. § 31-6-42, but also Health Planning Agency standards and criteria interpreting those standards, to make a decision in the case before the board. North Fulton Community Hosp. v. State Health Planning & Dev. Agency, 168 Ga. App. 801, 310 S.E.2d 764 (1983).
Reversal of the agency and denial of a Certificate of Need (CON) was affirmed because the atypical barrier exception did not support the agency's grant of the CON as the agency's interpretation of the atypical barrier exception in the rule was inconsistent with the plain language of the rule, clearly erroneous, and prejudiced the substantial rights of the challenging hospitals who already provided the same services. ASMC, LLC v. Northside Hosp., Inc., 344 Ga. App. 576, 810 S.E.2d 663 (2018).
- Cardiac Surgery Rule, Rule 272-2-.09(13), promulgated pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 31-6-21, does not place a two-year moratorium on applications for adult cardiac surgery services and pediatric cardiac catheterization and surgical services, but merely requires that the applicant show need. Chatham County Hosp. Auth. & Mem. Medical Center, Inc. v. St. Joseph's Hosp., 178 Ga. App. 628, 344 S.E.2d 463 (1986).
Cited in Ga. Dep't of Cmty. Health, Div. of Health Planning v. Gwinnett Hosp. Sys., 262 Ga. App. 879, 586 S.E.2d 762 (2003).
Total Results: 6
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-02-06
Snippet: including the certificate of need program.” OCGA § 31-6-21 (b) (4). The statute specifically au- thorizes
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-06-30
Snippet: the rule”) (citation omitted). See also OCGA § 31-6-21.1 (a) (“Rules of the [DCH] shall be adopted, promulgated
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-06-30
Citation: 295 Ga. 446, 761 S.E.2d 74, 2014 WL 2925207, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 543
Snippet: the rule”) (citation omitted). See also OCGA § 31-6-21.1 (a) (“Rules of the [DCH] shall be adopted, promulgated
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-09-13
Citation: 278 Ga. 366, 602 S.E.2d 648, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2937, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 627
Snippet: regulations were authorized by statute, OCGA § 31-6-21 (b) (4), and that they were reasonable. Albany
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-05-26
Citation: 501 S.E.2d 798, 269 Ga. 540
Snippet: legislative grant of authority is set forth in OCGA § 31-6-21(b)(4), which provides that it is authorized "to
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-02-07
Citation: 439 S.E.2d 494, 263 Ga. 798, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 479, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 71
Snippet: rules in order to administer that program. OCGA § 31-6-21 (a) and (b) (4). The detailed procedures for rulemaking