O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 32-6-72 (2019)

Designation of outdoor advertising which may be erected or maintained within 660 feet of nearest edge of right of way

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No outdoor advertising shall be erected or maintained within 660 feet of the nearest edge of the right of way and visible from the main traveled way of the interstate or primary highways in this state, except the following: (1) Directional and other official signs and notices; (2) Signs advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which they are located; (3) Signs advertising activities conducted or maintained within 100 feet of the nearest part of the activity as the dimensions of said activity are determined by department regulations, which regulations need not take into consideration the property lines of said activity; (4) Signs located in areas zoned commercial or industrial, which signs provide information in the specific interest of the traveling public;

(5) Signs located in unzoned commercial or industrial areas, which signs provide information in the specific interest of the traveling public; and (6) Directional signs, displays, and devices about goods and services in the specific interest of the traveling public located in a defined area or areas approved by the United States Secretary of Transportation.

History

Ga. L. 1967, p. 423, § 3; Ga. L. 1971, Ex. Sess., p. 5, § 3; Code 1933, § 95A-915, enacted by Ga. L. 1973, p. 947, § 1; Ga. L. 1979, p. 1086, § 3.

Annotations

Code Commission notes. - Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1985, a comma was deleted between ‘‘public’’ and ‘‘located’’ in paragraph (6).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Signs prohibited near interstate even if primary roads intervene. - This clear legislative proscription cannot be thwarted by the mere fact that other roads, even ‘‘primary roads,’’ intervene between the sign and the interstate highway. Turner Communications Corp. v. Georgia Dep’t of Transp., 139 Ga. App. 436, 228 S.E.2d 399 (1976). State’s police power to zone against future use without compensation. - Police power of the state to zone property to prevent the property’s use for certain purposes in the future, as distinguished from the taking or damaging in respect to a use already in existence, is not open to question, and does not require the payment of any compensation. National Adv. Co. v. State Hwy. Dep’t, 230 Ga. 119, 195 S.E.2d 895 (1973). Strip zoning. - Denial of the request of landowners and a sign company for permits to erect outdoor advertising did not violate statutory authority, under O.C.G.A. §§ 32-6-71(29) and 32-6-72(4),

which allowed such advertising on commercially zoned property but provided that strip zoned property was not properly considered commercially zoned, or Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. 672-6-.01(q) (1988), defining strip zoning, because: (1) the land on which the advertising would be erected was small in comparison to the owners’ total property; (2) was rezoned to commercial use, a use less restrictive than surrounding property; (3) rezoning did not regard the neighborhood’s character, as there was no commercial activity in the immediate vicinity; and (4) rezoning a small parcel to a less restrictive use out of character with surrounding land benefitted only the parcel’s owners. Walker v. DOT, 279 Ga. App. 287, 630 S.E.2d 878 (2006). Cited in Charles v. Cobb County, 231 Ga. 696, 203 S.E.2d 503 (1974); Department of Transp. v. El Carlo Motel, Inc., 140 Ga. App. 779, 232 S.E.2d 126 (1976); State v. Cafe Erotica, Inc., 270 Ga. 97, 507 S.E.2d 732 (1998).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Issuance of permits for outdoor advertising devices. - Outdoor advertising devices located in areas zoned by local governments and subject to regulation by the department can be lawfully erected

and maintained only in areas zoned, without further action of the local governing body, for commercial or industrial activities. 1975 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 75-24.

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Building regulations as applicable to billboards and similar structures, 60 A.L.R. 1158. Municipality’s power to permit private owner to construct building or structure overhanging or crossing the air space above public street or sidewalk, 76 A.L.R.2d 896. Validity and construction of provision prohibiting or regulating advertising sign overhanging street or sidewalk, 80 A.L.R.3d 687.

Validity and construction of statute or ordinance restricting outdoor rate advertising by motels, motor courts, and the like, 80 A.L.R.3d 740. Validity and construction of state or local regulation prohibiting the erection or maintenance of advertising structures within a specified distance of street or highway, 81 A.L.R.3d 564.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: Walker v. Dep't of Transp., 630 S.E.2d 878 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006).
Walker v. Dep't of Transp., 630 S.E.2d 878 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 7× “12 Under OCGA § 32-6-72 (4), outdoor advertising is permitted on commercially or industrially zoned property.”
Garden Club of Georgia, Inc. v. Shackelford, 463 S.E.2d 470 (Ga. 1995). · cites it 12× “The phrase, "in the specific interest of the traveling public," is defined in OCGA § 32-6-71(23) as "information regarding places offering lodging, food, motor vehicle fuels and lubricants, motor vehicle service and repair facilities, or any other service or product available to…”
Amg, LLC v. Georgia Dep't of Transp. (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 27× “Finally, the ALJ reasoned that application of the 660-foot requirement in OCGA § 32-6-722 to the 5,000-foot spacing rule in OCGA § 32-6-75 (c) (1) (C) would lead to the “logically inconsistent and absurd conclusion that the distance between 2 OCGA § 32-6-72 (4) - (5) provides…”
Victory Media Grp., LLC v. Georgia Dep't of Transp., 319 Ga. 16 (Ga. 2024). · cites it 8× “]” See OCGA § 32-6-72. Appellant contends that the “Act further restricts permissible signs based on the type of message contained in the sign[,]” and in support Appellant points to the “spacing, location, and configuration requirements” and various exemptions in the Act.”
Dep't of Transp. v. Sapp Outdoor Advert. Co., 319 S.E.2d 87 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 32-6-72 (5). An unzoned commercial area is defined, in pertinent part, as an area which is “not zoned by state law or local ordinance and on which there is located one or more permanent structures devoted to an in *229 dustrial or commercial activity or on which an…”
— 32-6-72(4) — 1 case
Garden Club of Georgia, Inc. v. Shackelford, 463 S.E.2d 470 (Ga. 1995). “The phrase, "in the specific interest of the traveling public," is defined in OCGA § 32-6-71(23) as "information regarding places offering lodging, food, motor vehicle fuels and lubricants, motor vehicle service and repair facilities, or any other service or product available to…”
— 32-6-72(6) — 1 case
Garden Club of Georgia, Inc. v. Shackelford, 463 S.E.2d 470 (Ga. 1995). “The phrase, "in the specific interest of the traveling public," is defined in OCGA § 32-6-71(23) as "information regarding places offering lodging, food, motor vehicle fuels and lubricants, motor vehicle service and repair facilities, or any other service or product available to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.