Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1966, p. 588, § 1; Ga. L. 1969, p. 495, §§ 3, 6; Ga. L. 1972, p. 931, §§ 3-10; Code 1933, § 95A-623, enacted by Ga. L. 1973, p. 947, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 32; Ga. L. 1988, p. 1737, § 3.)
- The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, referred to in this Code section, is codified as 42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq.
- By requiring the Department of Transportation to be guided by federal law "to the greatest extent practicable" in the department's condemnation procedures, subsection (b) of O.C.G.A. § 32-8-1 does not thereby require the department to abide by the federal law's prohibition of compensation for enhancement by reason of taking and does not affect the judiciary's power to determine what constitutes just and adequate compensation. DOT v. White, 173 Ga. App. 68, 325 S.E.2d 397 (1984).
- Enactment of O.C.G.A. § 32-8-1 does not alter the fact that relocation expenses, whether awarded judicially or administratively, are still a part of the "just and adequate compensation" guaranteed to condemnees under the Constitution. DOT v. Gibson, 251 Ga. 66, 303 S.E.2d 19 (1983).
- Under O.C.G.A. § 32-8-1, a condemnee whose property is being acquired for federally assisted highway projects may, but is not required to, seek payment of relocation expenses directly from the Department of Transportation in an administrative action. DOT v. Gibson, 251 Ga. 66, 303 S.E.2d 19 (1983).
- When the case does not involve payments under O.C.G.A. § 32-8-1, the condemnee would be able to litigate the question of the condemnee's business relocation expenses as an element of "just and adequate compensation" in the condemnation proceedings under O.C.G.A. § 32-3-1 et seq. DOT v. Gibson, 251 Ga. 66, 303 S.E.2d 19 (1983).
Seeking administrative payment of relocation expenses precludes a separate judicial determination of the same relocation expenses in the statutorily authorized condemnation proceedings. DOT v. Gibson, 251 Ga. 66, 303 S.E.2d 19 (1983).
- If a condemnee is dissatisfied with an award of relocation expenses under O.C.G.A. § 32-8-1, the award may be appealed under the Administrative Procedure Act, O.C.G.A. Ch. 13, T. 50. DOT v. Gibson, 251 Ga. 66, 303 S.E.2d 19 (1983).
- O.C.G.A. § 32-8-1 provides a remedy to recover attorney fees separate and apart from a condemnation proceeding where just and adequate compensation is at issue. DOT v. B & G Realty, Inc., 197 Ga. App. 613, 398 S.E.2d 762 (1990).
Cited in DOT v. Doss, 238 Ga. 480, 233 S.E.2d 144 (1977); DOT v. Rushing, 143 Ga. App. 235, 237 S.E.2d 722 (1977).
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-07-05
Citation: 299 Ga. 315, 788 S.E.2d 392, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 448
Snippet: or revocation of the directive. See OCGA § 31-32-8 (1). A provider furnished with a copy of an advance
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1983-05-25
Citation: 303 S.E.2d 19, 251 Ga. 66
Snippet: relocation assistance in accordance with OCGA § 32-8-1 (Code Ann. § 95A-623), Georgia's version of the