O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-2-24 (2019)

Enforcement of title and rules, regulations, and orders; issuance of orders without hearings; civil actions; criminal violations; penalties

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Whenever it may appear to the Commissioner, either upon investigation or otherwise, that any person has engaged in, is engaging in, or is about to engage in any act, practice, or transaction which is prohibited by this title or by any rule, regulation, or order of the Commissioner promulgated or issued pursuant to this title or which is declared to be unlawful under this title, the Commissioner may at his discretion issue an order, if he deems it to be appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of policyholders or the citizens of this state, prohibiting such person from continuing such act, practice, or transaction.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, in situations where persons otherwise would be entitled to a hearing prior to an order, the Commissioner may issue a proposed order to be effective upon a later date without hearing, unless persons subject to the order request a hearing within ten days after receipt of the order. Failure to make the request shall constitute a waiver of any provision of law for the hearing. The order shall contain or shall be accompanied by a notice of opportunity for hearing which clearly explains that the opportunity must be requested within ten days of receipt of the order and notice. The order and notice shall be served in person by the Commissioner or his agent or by registered or certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested.

(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, in situations where persons otherwise would be entitled to a hearing prior to an order, the Commissioner may issue an order to be effective immediately, if the Commissioner has reasonable cause to believe: that an act, practice, or transaction is occurring or is about to occur; that the situation constitutes a situation of imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare; and that the situation therefore imperatively requires emergency action. The emergency order shall contain findings to this effect and reasons for the determination. The order shall contain or be accompanied by a notice of opportunity for hearing which may provide that a hearing will be held if and only if a person subject to the order requests a hearing within ten days of receipt of the order and notice. The order and notice shall be served by delivery by the Commissioner or his agent or by registered or certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested.

(d) The Commissioner may institute actions or other legal proceedings as may be required for the enforcement of any provisions of this title. If the Commissioner has reason to believe that any person has violated any provision of this title for which criminal prosecution is provided, he shall so inform the prosecuting attorney in whose circuit or jurisdiction such violation may have occurred.

(e) The Commissioner may prosecute an action in any superior court of proper venue to enforce any order made by him pursuant to this title.

(f ) In cases in which the Commissioner institutes an action or other legal proceeding in a superior court of this state or prosecutes an action in a superior court to enforce his order, the superior court may among other appropriate relief issue an injunction restraining persons and those in active concert with them, including agents, employees, partners, officers, and directors, from engaging in acts prohibited by orders of the Commissioner or his rules or regulations or made unlawful or prohibited by this title.

(g) In addition to all other penalties provided for under this title, the Commissioner shall have the authority:

(1) To place any person duly licensed under this title on probation for a period of time not to exceed one year for each and every act in violation of this title or of the rules, regulations, or orders of the Commissioner; and (2) To subject any person duly licensed or that should be licensed under this title to a monetary penalty of up to $2,000.00 for each and every act in violation of this title or of the rules, regulations, or orders of the Commissioner, unless such person knew or reasonably should have known he or she was in violation of this title or of the rules, regulations, or orders of the Commissioner, in which case the monetary penalty provided for in this paragraph may be increased to an amount up to $5,000.00 for each and every act in violation.

(h) The Commissioner may not institute any action or impose any penalty against an insurer because an insurer engages in transactions consistent with the provisions of Chapter 12 of Title 10, the ‘‘Uniform Electronic Transactions Act,’’ or Code Section 33-24-14.

History

Code 1933, § 56-214, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 1245, § 1; Ga. L. 1976, p. 411, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 33; Ga. L. 2000, p. 136, § 33; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1589, § 3; Ga. L.

2005, p. 563, § 1/HB 407; Ga. L. 2010, p. 9, § 1-63/HB 1055; Ga. L. 2014, p. 818, § 1/HB 840; Ga. L. 2014, p. 829, § 1/HB 645.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Consumer Life Ins. Co. v. United States, 524 F.2d 1167 (Ct. Cl. 1975); State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Sweat, 547 F. Supp. 233 (N.D. Ga. 1982); Am. Ass’n of Cab Cos. v. Parham, 291 Ga.

App. 33, 661 S.E.2d 161 (2008); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hernandez Auto Painting & Body Works, 312 Ga. App. 756, 719 S.E.2d 597 (2011).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 43 Am. Jur. 2d, Insurance, § 27 et seq. C.J.S. - 44 C.J.S., Insurance, § 67 et seq. ALR. - Personal liability of public of-

ficials or bond for permitting insurance company or other corporation to engage or continue in business without complying with statutory requirement, 131 A.L.R. 275.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2023 · leading case: Am. Ass'n of Cab Companies v. Parham, 661 S.E.2d 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008).
Am. Ass'n of Cab Companies v. Parham, 661 S.E.2d 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “See OCGA § 33-2-24 (a) (granting the Insurance Commissioner the discretion “in the public interest or for the protection of policyholders or the citizens of this state” to issue an order “prohibiting [a] person from continuing [an] act, practice, or transaction”).”
Turpeau v. Fid. Fin. Servs., Inc., 936 F. Supp. 975 (N.D. Ga. 1996). · cites it 4× “C.G.A. §§ 33-2-26, 33-2-27. To enforce his or her decisions, the Commissioner has the power to enter an order prohibiting such practice and can institute civil and criminal proceedings against violators.”
Colonial Life & Accident Ins. v. Heveder, 618 S.E.2d 39 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “, OCGA §§ 33-2-24 (g) (enhanced penalty for violation of title if insurer or others knew or shouldhave known of violation); 33-13-13 (b) (receiver may not recover dividend unless insurer knew or should have known that distribution might impair its obligations); 33-37-21 (a) (4)…”
McCowan v. Progressive Preferred Ins., 618 S.E.2d 139 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 33-2-24 (g) provides that where an insurer knew or reasonably should have known that it was in violation of state insurance rules and regulations, the Commissioner may increase the fine up to $5,000 for “each and every act in violation.”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hernandez Auto Painting & Body Works, Inc., 719 S.E.2d 597 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 33-2-24; Cross v. Tokio Marine & Fire Ins.”
Cheryl Tisdale v. Farmers Ins. Exch. (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 4× “12 Pursuant to OCGA § 33-2-24 (a) (5), TNC services means (A) The period of time a driver is logged on to the [TNC’s] digital network and available to accept a ride request until the driver is logged off, except for that time period described in subparagraph (B) of this…”
— 33-2-24(a) — 1 case
Am. Ass'n of Cab Companies v. Parham, 661 S.E.2d 161 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). “See OCGA § 33-2-24 (a) (granting the Insurance Commissioner the discretion “in the public interest or for the protection of policyholders or the citizens of this state” to issue an order “prohibiting [a] person from continuing [an] act, practice, or transaction”).”
— 33-2-24(g) — 1 case
McCowan v. Progressive Preferred Ins., 618 S.E.2d 139 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). “OCGA § 33-2-24 (g) provides that where an insurer knew or reasonably should have known that it was in violation of state insurance rules and regulations, the Commissioner may increase the fine up to $5,000 for “each and every act in violation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.