O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 33-3-19 (2019)

Mandatory refusal, revocation, or suspension of certificate

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Commissioner shall refuse to issue or to renew or shall revoke or suspend an insurer’s certificate of authority:

(1) If such action is required by any provision of this title; or

(2) If the insurer no longer meets the requirements for the authority originally granted on account of deficiency in assets or otherwise.

History

Code 1933, § 56-316, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Cochran v. Paco, Inc., 409 F. Supp. 219 (N.D. Ga. 1975).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Former Code 1933, § 56-307 controlled in conflict with this section. - As a matter of statutory construction, the more specific statute, i.e., former Code 1933, § 56-307 (see O.C.G.A. § 33-3-7), governs in case of a seeming conflict with a more general one such as paragraph (2) of Ga. L. 1960, p. 289, § 1 (see O.C.G.A. § 33-3-19). 1963-65 Op. Att’y Gen. p. 216. Words ‘‘deficiency in assets’’ are intended to apply primarily to such items as ‘‘impairment of capital’’ and ‘‘insufficiency of policy reserves’’; if both capital and expendable surplus were required to be maintained at all times they would be synonymous; the separate provisions for

‘‘capital’’ and for ‘‘expendable surplus’’ make it evident that the two are not synonymous. 1963-65 Op. Att’y Gen. p. 216. Commissioner may allow reduction of paid-in surplus. - Although paid-in surplus is required of all companies upon their authorization to do business in the State of Georgia, it is within the discretion of the Commissioner to determine at what time the particular company is in such sound financial position as to no longer require this account to be maintained at its original level. 1963-65 Op. Att’y Gen. p. 216.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 43 Am. Jur. 2d, Insurance, §§ 30, 33.

C.J.S. - 44 C.J.S., Insurance, §§ 63 et seq., 79, 139 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1997–1997 · leading case: Generali — U. S. Branch v. Se. Sec. Ins., 493 S.E.2d 731 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997).
Generali — U. S. Branch v. Se. Sec. Ins., 493 S.E.2d 731 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “OCGA §§ 33-3-19; 33-3-20. In passing Ga. L.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.