Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 33-34-8 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 33 INSURANCE

Section 34. Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations, 33-34-1 through 33-34-9.

ARTICLE 2 PREFERRED PROVIDER ARRANGEMENTS

33-34-8. Rules and regulations.

The Commissioner shall provide by rule or regulation procedures for the expeditious and efficient settlement of first-party property damage claims under personal private passenger motor vehicle policies.Such procedures may include, but shall not be limited to:

  1. Loss of use reimbursements;
  2. Cost of repairs;
  3. Determination of fair market value on total losses;
  4. Use of aftermarket parts;
  5. Time limitations for payments of claims for property damage by insureds; and
  6. Establishment of a panel for arbitration of disputed property damage claims where such claims involve total losses.

(Code 1981, §33-34-8, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 1608, § 1.12.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Conditional payment of benefit.

- Insurance company's conditional payment of Georgia's basic no-fault benefits in an effort to settle litigation did not constitute an admission that Georgia no-fault insurance provisions applied, or an admission of liability or bad faith. Johnson v. Occidental Fire & Cas. Co., 954 F.2d 1581 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 33-34-8

Total Results: 4  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1324 v. Roberts, 434 S.E.2d 450 (Ga. 1993).

Cited 29 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 13, 1993 | 263 Ga. 405, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 3304

...le. The ultimate holding in Mowery was, however, correct for a different reason. As in Fowler, the no-fault policy was a contract of indemnity providing its own measure of damages which contractually bound the no-fault carrier. Moreover, former OCGA § 33-34-8 (a), which was also cited as authority in Mowery, clearly rendered the collateral source evidence irrelevant and compelled the holding that the no-fault carrier could not rely defensively upon the claimant's receipt of workers' compensation benefits....
Copy

Hinton v. Interstate Guar. Ins., 480 S.E.2d 842 (Ga. 1997).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 24, 1997 | 267 Ga. 516, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 599

...ative realm without authority. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent. NOTES [1] 220 Ga.App. 699, 702, 470 S.E.2d 292 (1996). [2] OCGA § 33-7-11. [3] Hinton v. Interstate Guaranty Ins. Co., 220 Ga. App. 699, 470 S.E.2d 292. [4] OCGA § 33-34-1 to OCGA § 33-34-8....
Copy

Doran v. Travelers Indem. Co., 326 S.E.2d 221 (Ga. 1985).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 27, 1985 | 254 Ga. 63

...The court stated that an earlier opinion which the Court of Appeals had followed, Freeman v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc., 244 Ga. 80, 259 *65 SE2d 36 (1979), was no longer applicable because it was decided under the Georgia Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations Act as it existed prior to an April 1979 amendment to section 33-34-8, which now provides that an employee may recover no-fault benefits reduced to a limited extent by the amount he collected as workers' compensation....
Copy

Hall v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 S.E.2d 530 (Ga. 1985).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 27, 1985 | 254 Ga. 633

...State Farm agreed to pay this claim. However, the insurance company refused to pay another claim by Hall for $5,000 on top of his PIP benefits under his policy's medical payment benefits clause. The dispute over the additional $5,000 revolves around OCGA § 33-34-8 (d) which provides that medical payment benefits are excess over any benefits required by the no-fault chapter....
...*634 The dispute is resolved by a consideration of the words of the statute. They are: "Medical payment benefits and uninsured motorists' benefits payable under coverages in motor vehicle insurance policies shall be excess over any benefits required by this chapter." OCGA § 33-34-8 (d)....