Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §33-37-23, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 1424, § 7.)
- Because a New York Order of Rehabilitation enjoined any actions, lawsuits, or proceedings against an insurance company, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 33-37-23(a), the trial court was required to grant a stay as to proceedings against the insurance company in order to give full faith and credit to the injunction ordered by the New York court. Aon Risk Servs. v. Commercial & Military Sys. Co., 270 Ga. App. 510, 607 S.E.2d 157 (2004).
- Trial court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs' breach of contract, misrepresentation, and other claims against a workers compensation trust fund because while the court properly concluded that the Georgia Insurance Commissioner, as an appointed receiver, had the exclusive authority to prosecute legal claims that were common to the insolvent trust fund, the court erred in finding that the plaintiffs did not have standing to prosecute claims that were personal in nature and not common to the trust fund. Superior Roofing Co. of Ga., Inc. v. Am. Prof'l Risk Servs., 323 Ga. App. 416, 744 S.E.2d 400 (2013).
- 43 Am. Jur. 2d, Insurance, §§ 101, 889.
- 44 C.J.S., Insurance, § 206 et seq.
No results found for Georgia Code 33-37-23.