Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448For all pending and future claims in insolvencies existing on July 1, 1997, and for all claims in future insolvencies, the priority of distribution of claims from the insurer's estate shall be in accordance with the order as set forth in this Code section. Every claim in each class shall be paid in full or adequate funds retained for such payment before the members of the next class receive any payment. No subclasses shall be established within any class. The order of distribution of claims shall be:
(Code 1981, §33-37-41, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 1424, § 7; Ga. L. 1997, p. 683, § 2; Ga. L. 1997, p. 1581, § 3.)
- Pursuant to Code Section28-9-3, in 1997, the amendment of this Code section by Ga. L. 1997, p. 683, § 2, was treated as impliedly repealed and superseded by Ga. L. 1997, p. 1581, § 3, due to irreconcilable conflict. See County of Butts v. Strahan, 151 Ga. 417 (1921); Keener v. McDougall, 232 Ga. 273 (1974).
- Ga. L. 1997, p. 683, § 6, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the 1997 amendment "shall apply to all claims filed in any proceeding to liquidate an insurer, which proceeding is pending on July 1, 1997, or which is commenced on or after July 1, 1997."
Ga. L. 1997, p. 1581, § 5, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the 1997 amendment "shall apply to all claims filed in any proceeding to liquidate an insurer which proceeding is pending on July 1, 1997, or which is commenced on or after July 1, 1997".
- State did not waive the state's sovereign immunity in passing the Insurers Rehabilitation and Liquidation Act, O.C.G.A. § 33-37-1 et seq., and could not be held liable for excessive administrative charges to a liquidated insurer's estate. However, if the intentional or wanton conduct of the liquidator allowed the excessive charges, the liquidator could be held liable; O.C.G.A. § 33-37-8.1(b) did not provide immunity for intentional or willful and wanton conduct. State of Ga. v. International Indemnity Company, 343 Ga. App. 647, 809 S.E.2d 64 (2017).
- Parties who would otherwise be general creditors of an insurance company with Class 4 priority claims could not convert those parties' claims to Class 1 priority claims by agreeing with the rehabilitator to compromise the parties' claims against the company during the rehabilitation process. Oxendine v. Commissioner of Ins., 229 Ga. App. 604, 494 S.E.2d 545 (1998).
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-02-04
Citation: 823 S.E.2d 806, 305 Ga. 126
Snippet: considered OCGA §§ 33-37-20 (a) (4) and (5) and 33-37-41 (1) (A), which describe the liquidator's administrative
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1971-05-06
Citation: 182 S.E.2d 106, 227 Ga. 578, 1971 Ga. LEXIS 779
Snippet: 34, 37). A second shot was fired in the air (T-33, 37, 41). The deceased then made an advance on the defendant