O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-9-120 (2019)

Employer’s duty to insure payment of compensation

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Every employer subject to the compensation provisions of this chapter shall insure the payment of compensation to his employees in the manner provided in this article; and, while such insurance remains in force, he or those conducting his business shall be liable to any employee for personal injury or death by accident only to the extent and in the manner specified in this article.

History

(Ga. L. 1920, p. 167, § 11; Code 1933, § 114-601; Ga. L. 1972, p. 929, § 3.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article surveying developments in Georgia workers’ compensation law from mid-1980 through

mid-1981, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 323 (1981).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Contract of insurance includes applicable provisions of Worker’s Compensation Act. - The provisions of the workers’ compensation law (see now O.C.G.A. § 34-9-1 et seq.) as a matter of law become a part of the contract of insurance as if expressly incorporated therein. Walker v. Bituminous Cas. Corp., 74 Ga. App. 517, 40 S.E.2d 228 (1946). Proof of negligence in failing to procure workers’ compensation insurance is not required before employers can be held personally liable for payment of workers’ compensation benefits. Sheehan v. Delaney, 238 Ga. App. 662, 521 S.E.2d 585 (1999). Employer’s obligation only to pay workers’ compensation benefits to injured employee. - Person who is compelled to pay damages because of liability imputed to the person as the result of a tort committed by another may maintain an action for indemnity against the person whose wrong has thus been imputed to that person. The plaintiff-employer in this case, however, has had no wrong imputed to it, nor does it otherwise have vicarious liability to its employee for the injuries allegedly inflicted by the defendant

tortfeasor; its obligation to the employee is to pay workers’ compensation benefits, an obligation which arises regardless of fault and is not shared by the defendant tortfeasor. North Ga. Elec. Membership Corp. v. Thomason & Holsomback Constr. Co., 157 Ga. App. 719, 278 S.E.2d 433 (1981). Action against employer’s agents for failure to procure insurance. - When an employer has failed to carry workers’ compensation insurance and has become insolvent, and the employer’s agents’ failure to procure such insurance coverage has rendered an injured employee’s compensation award uncollectible, the employee may maintain an action at law against those individual agents for an amount equal to the award of the Workers’ Compensation Board. Crawford v. Holt, 172 Ga. App. 326, 323 S.E.2d 245 (1984); Underwood v. Dunn, 221 Ga. App. 185, 470 S.E.2d 781 (1996). Cited in Seibels, Bruce & Co. v. National Sur. Corp., 63 Ga. App. 520, 11 S.E.2d 705 (1940); Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Keefe, 215 Ga. 830, 113 S.E.2d 774 (1960); Bradshaw v. Glass, 252 Ga. 429, 314 S.E.2d 233 (1984); Kraemer v. Crook,

94 Bankr. 207 (N.D. Ga. 1988); Housing Auth. v. Jackson, 226 Ga. App. 182, 486 S.E.2d 54 (1997). RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 82 Am. Jur. 2d, Workers’ Compensation, § 478 et seq. C.J.S. - 100 C.J.S., Workers’ Compensation, § 870 et seq. ALR. - Workmen’s compensation insurance premiums as within coverage of contractor’s bond, 102 ALR 135; 164 ALR 1468. Cancellation or attempted cancellation of insurance under Workmen’s Compensation Act, 107 ALR 1514. Insurance under Workmen’s Compensation Act as coextensive with insured’s liability under act, 108 ALR 812.

Rights and obligations under Workmen’s Compensation Act in respect of claims by employees of corporation during receivership or conservatorship of employer, 111 ALR 328. Policy of workmen’s compensation insurance issued to individual as covering employees of partnership of which he is a member, 114 ALR 724. Reinsurance of self-insurer under Workmen’s Compensation Acts, 153 ALR 967.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1984–2024 · leading case: Gulf States Underwriters of Louisiana, Inc. v. Bennett, 580 S.E.2d 550 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).
Gulf States Underwriters of Louisiana, Inc. v. Bennett, 580 S.E.2d 550 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “2d 14 (1975) (predecessor agency of State Board lacks subject matter jurisdiction over claim in which damages sought for alleged fraud).”
Kraemer v. Crook, 94 B.R. 207 (N.D. Ga. 1988). · cites it 5× “The plaintiff argues that an express trust is created by the Georgia statutory worker’s compensation scheme, particularly O.C.G.A. § 34-9-120. 2 Plaintiff also argues that the history of the worker’s compensation scheme is further support for a finding of an express trust.”
Bradshaw v. Glass, 314 S.E.2d 233 (Ga. 1984). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 34-9-120 (Code Ann. § 114-601). In establishing the employers and employees to which the Workers' Compensation Act is applicable, OCGA § 34-9-2(a) (Code Ann.”
Int'l Indem. Co. v. Reg'l Emp. Serv., Inc., 520 S.E.2d 533 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “OCGA §§ 34-9-120 through 34-9-138; 33-9-1 through 33-9-44.”
Sheehan v. Delaney, 521 S.E.2d 585 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 34-9-120 et seq.; Crawford v. Holt, 172 Ga.”
Hous. Auth. City of Cartersville v. Jackson, 486 S.E.2d 54 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “The Authority contends the superior court erred in affirming the State Board’s finding that Jackson was an “employee” entitled to medical benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act.”
Crawford v. Holt, 323 S.E.2d 245 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to OCGA § 34-9-120 et seq., an employer is required to insure the payment of workers’ compensation, either by procuring insurance coverage or by properly qualifying as a self-insurer.”
Underwood v. Dunn, 470 S.E.2d 781 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 34-9-120 requires employers insure the payment of workers’ compensation to their employees.”
C & H Couriers, Inc. v. Am. Mut. Ins., 318 S.E.2d 77 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “We note in passing that under the facts in this case appellant was required to provide workers’ compensation insurance for all its employees, not just its clerical staff (OCGA §§ 34-9-120 and 121) and, thus, the policy provided by appellee was likewise required to cover all of…”
Pogue v. Oglethorpe Power Corp., 477 S.E.2d 107 (Ga. 1996). · cites it 2× “In the present case, however, the relevant contract is a workers’ compensation insurance policy within the meaning of OCGA § 34-9-120. This policy benefits Pogue exactly as any other workers’ compensation insurance policy would.”
Georgia Insurers Insolvency Pool v. Zep, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “The Pool’s hypothetical conflates the insolvency of an insurer with an employer’s failure to obtain workers’ compensation coverage in the first instance.”
Osherow v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. et (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2022). · cites it 2× “See Ga. Code Ann. §§ 34-9-120 ,34-9-121(a) (West 2021) (workers compensation 1 “ECF” denotes electronic filing number in Adversary No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.