O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-9-136 (2019)

Statistical data submitted by insurance company to

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

rating organization; verification by employer; issuance of experience modification worksheets to insured.

(a) Before an insurance company is authorized to submit statistical data on an employer to any licensed rating organization for purposes of determining the employer’s experience modification factor, the insurance company must verify with the employer the accuracy of the data. In so verifying, the insurance company shall provide to the employer:

(1) the data to be submitted; and (2) a statement in boldface type, to be signed by an authorized representative of the employer, and submitted by the insurance company to the licensed rating organization along with the statistical data. Said statement shall indicate that the statistical data to be submitted have been reviewed by the authorized representative of the employer; that said data are accurate; and that an insurance company representative has explained to the employer’s representative that the statistical data to be submitted may affect the employer’s premium for workers’ compensation insurance coverage.

(b) When a licensed rating organization issues an insured’s experience modification worksheet to the insured’s workers’ compensation insurance company, the licensed rating organization shall submit a copy of the worksheet to the insured.

History

(Code 1981, § 34-9-136, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 1942, § 14; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1365, § 2.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For annual survey article discussing workers’ compensation law, see 52 Mercer L. Rev. 505 (2000). For note on 1992 enactment of this Code

section, see 9 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 285 (1992). For note on the 1993 amendment of this Code section, see 10 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 152 (1993).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Evidence of violation. - In an action to recover premiums due on workers’ compensation insurance policies, evidence showing the plaintiff insurer’s violation of O.C.G.A. § 34-9-136 was a circumstance that could be considered with respect to

the defendant’s counterclaim for damages to its business caused by excessive premiums charged. International Indem. Co. v. Regional Emplr. Serv., Inc., 239 Ga. App. 420, 520 S.E.2d 533, cert. denied, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 1019 (1999).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1999–1999 · leading case: Int'l Indem. Co. v. Reg'l Emp. Serv., Inc., 520 S.E.2d 533 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).
Int'l Indem. Co. v. Reg'l Emp. Serv., Inc., 520 S.E.2d 533 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 56× “Plaintiff's first enumeration of error complains of the denial of its motion in limine seeking to preclude defendant from offering or otherwise alluding to lost profits, lost income, diminished corporate reputation and diminution in value as a result of any alleged…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.