O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-9-367 (2019)

Liability of fund for interest or attorney’s fees

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Subsequent Injury Trust Fund shall not be liable for any interest on sums due claiming parties nor shall it be liable for attorney’s fees due attorneys of the claiming parties except where it is proven by a preponderance of evidence that the Subsequent Injury Trust Fund has failed or refused to accept a valid claim for reimbursement as provided for under this chapter in whole or in part without reasonable grounds; in such a circumstance, the party seeking reimbursement may be entitled to attorney’s fees as provided under subsection (b) of Code Section 34-9-108.

History

(Code 1933, § 114-915, enacted by Ga. L. 1977, p. 608, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 34; Ga. L. 1996, p. 1291, § 15.)

Annotations

Code Commission notes. - Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1988, ‘‘attorney’s’’ was substituted for ‘‘attorneys’ ’’. Law reviews. - For annual survey of law of worker’s compensation, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 479 (2004).

For review of 1996 workers’ compensation legislation, see 13 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 233 (1996).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Liability for attorney’s fees. - Attorney’s fees of an employer or insurer are not recoverable from the fund. Georgia Subsequent Injury Trust Fund v.

Muscogee Iron Works, 265 Ga. 790, 462 S.E.2d 367 (1995) (decided prior to 1996 amendment).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Workers’ compensation: availability, rate, or method of calculation of

interest on attorney’s fees or penalties, 79 ALR5th 201.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1995–1995 · leading case: Muscogee Iron Works v. Ward, 455 S.E.2d 363 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Muscogee Iron Works v. Ward, 455 S.E.2d 363 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 18× “We granted a discretionary appeal in this workers’ compensation case to address an issue of first impression regarding the construction of OCGA § 34-9-367. The superior court affirmed the State Board of Workers’ Compensation’s award of reimbursement from the Subsequent Injury…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.