O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 34-9-42 (2019)

Qualifications and roles of members

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The chairperson of the board shall be a person who, on account of his or her previous employment, affiliation, or experience, shall be considered knowledgeable of the concerns of the public at large. One of the remaining two board members shall be a person who, on account of his or her previous employment, association, or affiliation, shall be knowledgeable of the concerns of employers; and the one remaining member of the board shall be a person whose previous employment or affiliation has been as a member of a group subject to this chapter as an employee, regardless of whether the employment of such person has been with a person, firm, or corporation actually operating under this chapter, and who shall be knowledgeable of the concerns of employees.

(b) The chairperson and each board member shall be a member of the State Bar of Georgia with at least seven years of practice experience and shall be subject to the Georgia Code of Judicial Conduct.

History

(Code 1933, § 114-701.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1975, p. 198, § 6; Ga. L. 1994, p. 887, § 5.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For note on the 1994 amendment of this Code Section, see 11 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 204 (1994). JUDICIAL DECISIONS Temporary deputy director need not meet qualifications. - Person appointed by the board to serve temporarily on the board as a deputy director pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 34-9-47 need not meet the qualifications of a regular director of

the board selected by the governor pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 34-9-40 and 34-9-42. Dougherty County Bd. of Educ. v. Lundy, 183 Ga. App. 550, 359 S.E.2d 403, cert. denied, 183 Ga. App. 906, 359 S.E.2d 403 (1987).

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. - 100 C.J.S., Workers’ Compensation, § 830 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1987–1987 · leading case: Dougherty Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Lundy, 359 S.E.2d 403 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).
Dougherty Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Lundy, 359 S.E.2d 403 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 6× “Dougherty County and its insurer appealed to the superior court which found (1) the Board exceeded its authority in making the July 1 award in that (a) it conducted a de novo consideration of the evidence and (b) the error caused by Southard’s presence on the earlier Board,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.