Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to relieve any employer or employee from any penalty for failure or neglect to perform any statutory duty.
(Ga. L. 1920, p. 167, § 13; Code 1933, § 114-104.)
- Former Code 1933, § 114-104 (see now O.C.G.A. § 34-9-9) applied solely to penalties and did not limit or qualify former Code 1933, § 114-103 (see now O.C.G.A. § 34-9-11) so as to provide any greater remedy to the employee. Reid v. Lummus Cotton Gin Co., 58 Ga. App. 184, 197 S.E. 904 (1938); Southern Wire & Iron, Inc. v. Fowler, 217 Ga. 727, 124 S.E.2d 738 (1962).
Cited in Hayes v. Consolidated Freightways, 131 Ga. App. 77, 205 S.E.2d 40 (1974).
- 82 Am. Jur. 2d, Workers' Compensation, §§ 504, 583, 624, 629, 632.
- 100 C.J.S., Workers' Compensation, § 701 et seq.
- State Workmen's Compensation Act as precluding action based on noncompliance with Federal Safety Appliance Act to recover for death or injury to railroad employee while engaged in intrastate commerce, 98 A.L.R. 511; 104 A.L.R. 839.
What conduct is willful, intentional, or deliberate within Workmen's Compensation Act provision authorizing tort action for such conduct, 96 A.L.R.3d 1064.
Validity, construction, and application of provisions of workers' compensation act for additional compensation because of failure to comply with specific requirement of statute or regulation by public for protection of workers, 31 A.L.R.6th 199.
No results found for Georgia Code 34-9-9.