O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 36-32-10.2 (2019)
Trial upon citation, summons, or accusation
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notwithstanding any other contrary provision of law, in municipal courts which have jurisdiction over misdemeanor offenses or ordinance violations, such offenses or violations may be tried upon a uniform traffic citation, summons, citation, or an accusation.
History
Code 1981, § 36-32-10.2, enacted by Ga. L. 2002, p. 627, § 1.
Annotations
Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘Should Georgia Change Its Misdemeanor Arrest Laws to Authorize Issuing More Field Citations? Can Alternative Arrest Process
Help Alleviate Georgia’s Jail Overcrowding and Reduce the Time Arresting Officers Expend Processing Nontraffic Misdemeanor Offenses?,’’ see 22 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 313 (2005).
JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Beaman v. City of Peachtree City, 256 Ga. App. 62, 567 S.E.2d 715 (2002).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2002–2003 · leading case: Walker v. State, 574 S.E.2d 317 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).
Walker v. State, 574 S.E.2d 317 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003). “Significantly, in Beaman , we recognized that the legislature recently enacted a Code section, OCGA § 36-32-10.2, which provides: “Notwithstanding any other contrary provision of law, in municipal courts which have jurisdiction over misdemeanor offenses or ordinance violations,…”
Beaman v. City of Peachtree City, 567 S.E.2d 715 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). “On May 9, 2002, the Governor signed into law a bill that added OCGA § 36-32-10.2, which states, “Notwithstanding any other contrary provision of law, in municipal courts which have jurisdiction over misdemeanor offenses or ordinance violations, such offenses or violations may be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.