Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Whenever the limits of a municipal corporation are enlarged in accordance with this article, it shall be the duty of the clerk, city attorney, or other person designated by the governing authority of the municipal corporation to cause an identification of the annexed territory to be filed with the Department of Community Affairs and with the governing authority of the county in which the property is located in accordance with Code Section 36-36-3.
(Ga. L. 1970, p. 426, § 6; Code 1981, §36-36-49; Code 1981, §36-36-59, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1992, p. 2592, § 3; Ga. L. 2000, p. 164, § 10.)
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1992, "is" was deleted following "territory".
- Provisions of Ga. L. 1970, p. 426, § 1 et seq. (see O.C.G.A. § 36-36-50 et seq.) do not take away legislative authority to pass local acts annexing territory to municipal corporations. These sections provide an alternative method to the continuing power of the General Assembly to extend or diminish the corporate limits of a municipality. Ballentine v. Willingham, 237 Ga. 60, 226 S.E.2d 593, appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 909, 97 S. Ct. 298, 50 L. Ed. 2d 276 (1976).
- 62 C.J.S., Municipal Corporations, § 104 et seq.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-06-30
Citation: 486 S.E.2d 359, 268 Ga. 230, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 2426, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 363
Snippet: in violation of OCGA §§ 36-36-20, 36-36-21, and 36-36-59. [2] 42 U.S.C. § 1973c, which is § 5 of the VRA