Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 36-6-21 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 36 LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Section 6. County Treasurer, 36-6-1 through 36-6-28.

ARTICLE 2 COUNTY GOVERNING AUTHORITIES

36-6-21. Final settlement of accounts.

When the county treasurer or his personal representative has made a fair and full statement of all his accounts and liabilities as such, pursuant to Code Section 36-6-20, an exoneration of himself and his sureties, together with the details of such settlement, must be entered on the minutes of the county governing authority. It shall be final, except for fraud.

(Orig. Code 1863, § 542; Code 1868, § 606; Code 1873, § 565; Code 1882, § 565; Civil Code 1895, § 471; Civil Code 1910, § 587; Code 1933, § 23-1023.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Provisions of former Civil Code 1910, §§ 586 and 587 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 36-6-20 and36-6-21) were not applicable to annual accounting and settlement made by the tax collector with the county commissioners. Read v. Glynn County, 145 Ga. 881, 90 S.E. 60 (1916).

Cited in Board of Comm'rs v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co., 175 Ga. 584, 165 S.E. 828 (1932).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

- 20 C.J.S., Counties, §§ 205, 206.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 36-6-21 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 5

Development Authority of DeKalb County v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-09-28

Citation: 684 S.E.2d 856, 286 Ga. 36, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3050, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 479

Snippet: subject to the Development Authorities Law, OCGA § 36-62-1 et seq. ("DAL"). Under the provisions of the DAL

Murphy v. Pearson

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-09-22

Citation: 667 S.E.2d 83, 284 Ga. 296, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 2936, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 736

Snippet: L. 1967, p. 901), it is not affected by OCGA § 36-62-1 et seq., the "Development Authorities Law." See

Haney v. Development Authority of Bremen

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-07-08

Citation: 519 S.E.2d 665, 271 Ga. 403, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2504, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 659

Snippet: EX, sec. VI, para. III. Id. See OCGA §§ 36-62-1 to 36-62-13 (1993); see also Odom v. Union City

Maddox v. Schrader

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-11-17

Citation: 492 S.E.2d 521, 268 Ga. 661, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 4159, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 731

Snippet: proscriptions in the Development Authorities' Law, OCGA § 36-62-1 et seq., regarding county development authorities

Alexander v. MacOn-bibb County Urban Development Authority & Urban Properties 47

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-06-19

Citation: 357 S.E.2d 62, 257 Ga. 181, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 785

Snippet: Constitution, Art. IX, Sec. VI, Par. Ill), and OCGA § 36-62-1 et seq., The Development Authorities Law. The stated