Standards for determination of financial responsibility for children placed pursuant to compact
✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Financial responsibility for any child placed pursuant to the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Article V thereof in the first instance. However, in the event of partial or complete default of performance thereunder, Articles 1 and 2 of Chapter 11 of Title 19, relating to enforcement of support obligations and other applicable provisions of law may also be invoked.
History
Ga. L. 1977, p. 578, § 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Bauldree v. Mckenzie, No. 1:24-cv-00063 (M.D. Ga. Aug. 27, 2025).
Bauldree v. Mckenzie, No. 1:24-cv-00063 (M.D. Ga. Aug. 27, 2025). · cites it 2ד14 at 2–5); see O.C.G.A. §§ 39-4-8, 39-4-11. In response, Plaintiff states (1) that Defendants do not have immunity under the Georgia Workers’ Compensation Act, and (2) that he has stated a valid claim against Defendants in their individual capacities.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.