Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 4-5-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 4-5-2 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 4-5-2

TITLE 4 ANIMALS

Section 5. Disposal of Diseased, Disabled, or Dead Animals, 4-5-1 through 4-5-11.

ARTICLE 5 DEER FARMING

4-5-2. "Dead animals" defined.

As used in this chapter, the term "dead animals" means the carcasses, parts of carcasses, fetuses, embryos, effluent, or blood of livestock, including, without limitation, cattle, swine, sheep, goats, poultry, ratites, equine, and alternative livestock; pet animals associated with pet dealers, kennels, animal shelters, or bird dealers licensed by the Georgia Department of Agriculture; animals processed by commercial facilities which process animals for human consumption; and animals associated with wildlife exhibitions.

(Ga. L. 1969, p. 1018, § 2; Ga. L. 1973, p. 569, § 1; Ga. L. 1995, p. 244, § 7; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1397, § 1.)

Cases Citing Georgia Code 4-5-2 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 16

Blackwell v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-01-29

Citation: 302 Ga. 820, 809 S.E.2d 727

Snippet: commentary to ABA Standard for Criminal Justice 4-5.2 (2nd ed. 1980) that recognized the defense lawyer’s

State v. Garland

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-01-19

Snippet: Justice Standards for the Defense Function, Standard 4- 5.2 (“The decisions ultimately to be made by a competent

State v. Garland

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-01-19

Citation: 298 Ga. 482, 781 S.E.2d 787, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 173

Snippet: Justice Standards for the Defense Function, Standard 4-5.2 (“The decisions ultimately to be made by a competent

Cammer v. Walker

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-11-21

Citation: 290 Ga. 251, 719 S.E.2d 437, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3670, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 938

Snippet: Function and Defense Function, 3d ed., Standard 4-5.2 (a), Standard 4-6.2 cmt. (1993). ABA standards relating

Younger v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-11-08

Citation: 702 S.E.2d 183, 288 Ga. 195, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3635, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 847

Snippet: defense of abandonment as set forth in OCGA § 16-4-5.[2] But, Younger's requests for jury instructions

Linson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-10-04

Citation: 700 S.E.2d 394, 287 Ga. 881, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3209, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 639

Snippet: which the other does not." Waits v. State, supra at 4-5(2), 644 S.E.2d 127. See also Hutchins v. State, supra

Jackson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-01-26

Citation: 672 S.E.2d 640, 284 Ga. 826, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 284, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 13

Snippet: find no error. See Hardin v. State, 269 Ga. 1, 4-5(2)(c), 494 S.E.2d 647 (1998). 6. Jackson argues that

Hutchins v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-10-06

Citation: 667 S.E.2d 589, 284 Ga. 395, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3176, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 799

Snippet: which the other does not." Waits v. State, supra at 4-5(2), 644 S.E.2d 127. Furthermore, the crimes of malice

Rolland v. Martin

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-10-30

Citation: 637 S.E.2d 23, 281 Ga. 190, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3299, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 877

Snippet: personal knowledge. See Spires v. Relco, 165 Ga.App. 4, 5(2), 299 S.E.2d 58 (1983); Accredited Assoc. v. Shottenfeld

City of Roswell v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-07-02

Citation: 549 S.E.2d 90, 274 Ga. 130, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2061, 2001 Ga. LEXIS 537

Snippet: from the procedural requirements of OCGA § 36-66-4.5 2. The legislative intent in passing the Zoning Procedures

In the Interest of T. A. W.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-03-06

Citation: 265 Ga. 106, 454 S.E.2d 134, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 825, 1995 Ga. LEXIS 118

Snippet: the Interest of T. A. W., supra, 214 Ga. App. at 4-5. [2] Contrary to the argument of appellee, the prosecutor

Hogan v. Tompkins

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-04-15

Citation: 264 Ga. 116, 441 S.E.2d 746, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1518, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 282

Snippet: stress placed by the commentary to ABA Standard 4-5.2 on the importance of full consultation between accuseds

Powell v. Studstill

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-02-28

Citation: 264 Ga. 109, 441 S.E.2d 52, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 805, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 118

Snippet: 20-2-260 (k.1) and (r) (Ga. L. 1992, p. 3164, §§ 4, 5),[2] and based, in part, its issuance of the injunction

Collins v. Morris

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-01-24

Citation: 438 S.E.2d 896, 263 Ga. 734, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 319, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 52

Snippet: public official. . ..” Eaves v. Harris, supra at 4-5 (2) (b). 2. OCGA § 21-4-14 (a) provides limitations

Van Alstine v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-02-25

Citation: 426 S.E.2d 360, 263 Ga. 1, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 7750, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 264

Snippet: 379. As noted in the commentary to ABA Standard 4-5.2 (2nd ed. 1980),[1] "[m]any of the rights of an accused

McAuliffe v. Baum

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1914-10-13

Citation: 142 Ga. 590, 83 S.E. 239, 1914 Ga. LEXIS 464

Snippet: the landowner. Boisot on Mechanics’ Liens, §§ 1, 4, 5; 2 Jones on Liens, § 1235, p. 259. From what we have