O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 40-1-150 (2019)
Short title
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Georgia Limousine Carrier Act.”
History
Code 1981, § 40-1-150, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 580, § 1/HB 865.
Annotations
JUDICIAL DECISIONS Collection of state or local-option sales taxes. - Trial court’s grant of
summary judgment to the Georgia Department of Revenue on a limousine
MOTOR VEHICLES & TRAFFIC
company’s petition for a refund and declaration was upheld as no part of the Georgia Limousine Carrier Act, including O.C.G.A. § 40-1-168, barred the imposition and collection of state or local-option sales taxes from for-hire car
services such as the limousine company for the rental of its limousines or cars. Exec. Limousine Transp., Inc. v. Curry, 361 Ga. App. 626, 865 S.E.2d 217, 2021 Ga. App. LEXIS 522 (2021).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2021–2024 · leading case: Exec. Limousine Transp., Inc. v. David Curry, in His Off. Capacity as Revenue Comm'r of the Georgia Dep't of Revenue (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).
Exec. Limousine Transp., Inc. v. David Curry, in His Off. Capacity as Revenue Comm'r of the Georgia Dep't of Revenue (Ga. Ct. App. 2021). “This appeal presents questions of first impression concerning the meaning and application of the Georgia Limousine Carrier Act, OCGA § 40-1-150 et seq. (“the Act”), which was adopted into law in 2012.”
Aundray Barnes v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). “5 Part 3 encompasses OCGA §§ 40-1-150 through 40-1- 170, generally addressing Georgia limousine carriers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.