Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448An indictment or accusation shall not be required against a defendant under this article, but a citation and complaint specifically setting out the charge shall be issued. The court shall keep a docket on which shall be plainly kept the name and address of the defendant, the nature of the offense in brief, the date when brought before the court, and the final disposition of the case with the date thereof. Such docket shall be the same in each probate court handling traffic misdemeanor cases and shall be on a form to be prescribed by the Department of Law. Such docket shall be paid for from the treasury of the county in which such court is located. Municipal courts may use the dockets ordinarily in use by them in the trial of other cases or, in the discretion of the court, may adopt the docket provided in this Code section for probate courts.
(Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 558, § 6; Ga. L. 1987, p. 3, § 40.)
- At the time of the passage of Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 558, § 6 (see now O.C.G.A. § 40-13-24), the law of this state contemplated that every arrest, either for a misdemeanor or felony, would be made under a warrant. Cooper v. Lunsford, 203 Ga. 166, 45 S.E.2d 395 (1947).
- Having construed Ga. L. Ex. Sess. 1937-38, p. 558, as contemplating the creation of an insolvent costs fund in order to pay the sheriff costs in accordance with its provisions, and the Act by its terms making the ordinary (now probate judge) an officer of the court and specifying the amount of costs the ordinary (now probate judge) is to receive in each case, the General Assembly necessarily intended that the ordinary (now probate judge) would participate in the insolvent costs fund. Cooper v. Lunsford, 203 Ga. 166, 45 S.E.2d 395 (1947).
- Defendant's demand for a speedy trial upon receipt of a uniform traffic citation and complaint form was not premature since such a citation itself contains the accusation, the preferring of which is a prerequisite to a demand for speedy trial. Majia v. State, 174 Ga. App. 432, 330 S.E.2d 171, aff'd, 254 Ga. 660, 333 S.E.2d 834 (1985).
Cited in McSears v. State, 247 Ga. 48, 273 S.E.2d 847 (1981).
- An ordinary (now probate judge) who tries cases arising out of the violation of traffic laws shall be allowed the fee provided for by Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 558, § 5 (see now O.C.G.A. § 40-13-25) when the ordinary (now probate judge) enters a case on the docket pursuant to the ordinary's duties as set forth in Ga. L. 1937, Ex. Sess., p. 558, § 6 (see now O.C.G.A. § 40-13-24). 1968 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 68-213.
- 8 Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, §§ 984, 985, 995. 62B Am. Jur. 2d, Process, § 1.
- 21 C.J.S., Courts, §§ 239, 308.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-09-14
Citation: 506 S.E.2d 372, 269 Ga. 728
Snippet: 17-7-170(a). [3] OCGA § 17-7-170(b). [4] See OCGA §§ 40-13-24; 17-7-170(b). [5] OCGA § 40-13-3; State v. Gerbert
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1996-09-23
Citation: 475 S.E.2d 621, 267 Ga. 169, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 3395, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 710
Snippet: 17-7-170(b). [5] OCGA § 40-13-1. [6] See OCGA §§ 40-13-24; see also OCGA § 17-7-71(b) (defendant may be