Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Ga. L. 1961, p. 68, § 11; Ga. L. 1962, p. 79, § 8; Code 1981, §40-3-25; Ga. L. 1989, p. 1186, § 7; Code 1981, §40-3-24, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1990, p. 2048, § 3; Ga. L. 1997, p. 739, § 8.)
- For comment on Maley v. National Acceptance Co., 250 F. Supp. 841 (N.D. Ga. 1966), see 3 Ga. St. B.J. 248 (1966).
- Use of an unregistered trade name as the owner's name does not defeat a creditor's search for, and the giving of notice to the world of, the existence of the bank's security interest and does not therefore invalidate the bank's security interest. In re Firth, 363 F. Supp. 369 (M.D. Ga. 1973).
- Application for a certificate of title and a certificate stating that the title has been issued is not a copy of a certificate of title and, therefore, is not entitled to the effect that a certificate of title would have under subsection (c) of Ga. L. 1962, p. 79, § 8 (see now O.C.G.A. § 40-3-24). Harper v. Green, 115 Ga. App. 525, 154 S.E.2d 762 (1967).
Georgia certificate of title is not conclusive. By being only prima facie evidence of the question of title it can be contradicted by other evidence. Wielgorecki v. White, 133 Ga. App. 834, 212 S.E.2d 480 (1975).
Certificate of title is prima facie evidence of the ownership of an automobile and is sufficient to prove ownership in the absence of evidence clearly contradicting the facts recited in the certificate. United States v. Elliott, 571 F.2d 880 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 953, 99 S. Ct. 349, 58 L. Ed. 2d 344 (1978).
- Owner's name stated in the certificate of title is a "fact" within the meaning of subsection (c) of Ga. L. 1962, p. 79, § 8 (see now O.C.G.A. § 40-3-24). Thornton v. Alford, 112 Ga. App. 321, 145 S.E.2d 106 (1965).
Personal signature of the owner is not a "fact" within the meaning of subsection (c) of Ga. L. 1962, p. 79, § 8 (see now O.C.G.A. § 40-3-24) but merely a matter of form in making an application for the certificate. Thornton v. Alford, 112 Ga. App. 321, 145 S.E.2d 106 (1965).
- Judgment creditor cannot reach the debtor's rights in vehicles, certificates of title to which are held by the bank as security interests for the debtor's loans by attempting to garnish the certificates of title in the bank's hand. Cobb Bank & Trust Co. v. Springfield, 145 Ga. App. 753, 245 S.E.2d 42 (1978).
Cited in General Fire & Cas. Co. v. Kuffrey, 115 Ga. App. 121, 153 S.E.2d 590 (1967); Capital Auto. Co. v. GMAC, 119 Ga. App. 186, 166 S.E.2d 584 (1968); Waldrip v. Associates Fin. Servs. Co., 126 Ga. App. 560, 191 S.E.2d 302 (1972); Goger v. King, 17 Bankr. 64 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1981); Danforth v. Bulman, 276 Ga. App. 531, 623 S.E.2d 732 (2005).
- Issuance of title to another cannot deprive stolen vehicle's original owner of that owner's property right. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U70-224.
- 7A Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, §§ 30, 31.
- 60 C.J.S., Motor Vehicles, § 96 et seq.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-05-06
Citation: 356 S.E.2d 640, 257 Ga. 156, 14 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1075, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 728
Snippet: "Motor Vehicle Certificate of Title Act" (OCGA § 40-3-24 (d)) provides that motor vehicle records which