Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Ga. L. 1927, p. 226, § 17; Code 1933, § 68-404; Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 556, § 120; Ga. L. 1970, p. 628, § 1; Code 1933, § 68E-405, enacted by Ga. L. 1982, p. 165, § 4; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 40; Code 1981, §40-8-74, enacted by Ga. L. 1982, p. 165, § 10; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2785, § 28; Ga. L. 1993, p. 727, § 1; Ga. L. 2011, p. 479, § 17/HB 112.)
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1992, "transportation board" was substituted for "Transportation Board" in subsection (d).
- In a wrongful death and nuisance suit wherein the victim was killed while traveling in a taxi cab on a state highway, and the taxi cab had passed a mandatory city inspection the day prior, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the city inspector on the basis of official immunity as the inspector's act of inspecting the tires on the taxi cab was a ministerial function since the inspector was required to check for minimum tread depth and complete the inspection checklist before passing the vehicle as safe, which were simple, absolute, and definite tasks of a ministerial nature. As a result, the inspector was not entitled to official immunity and it was for the jury to determine if the inspector performed the tasks negligently. Heller v. City of Atlanta, 290 Ga. App. 345, 659 S.E.2d 617 (2008), aff'd, Ga. DOT v. Heller, 285 Ga. 262, 674 S.E.2d 914 (2009).
Decedent was killed when the taxi in which the decedent was riding spun out of control on a rain-slick road and hit a tree. The city employee who cleared the taxi for use on the roads was not shielded from liability by the doctrine of official immunity because: (1) inspection of tires was a minsterial act; (2) the employee did nothing to verify whether the taxi's badly worn tires had the legally required minimum amount of 2/32 inch of tread on the tires under O.C.G.A. § 40-8-74(e)(1); and (3) the employee had no "discretion" to ignore this minimum legal requirement. Ga. DOT v. Heller, 285 Ga. 262, 674 S.E.2d 914 (2009).
Cited in Woodard v. State, 289 Ga. App. 643, 658 S.E.2d 129 (2008).
- Studded tire is a metal tire within the meaning of O.C.G.A. § 40-8-74 and may not be used on vehicles operated in this state. 1968 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 68-487.
- 7A Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, §§ 185, 194. 8 Am. Jur. 2d, Automobiles and Highway Traffic, §§ 540 et seq., 734, 1064.
- 60 C.J.S., Motor Vehicles, § 18. 60A C.J.S., Motor Vehicles, §§ 621, 622, 978, 691, 692.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-08-13
Snippet: OCGA § 40-6-48, and improper tires under OCGA § 40-8-74. 3 The State
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-03-23
Citation: 674 S.E.2d 914, 285 Ga. 262, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1015, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 97
Snippet: enforce that statute. In addition, neither OCGA § 40-8-74 nor Atlanta City Code § 162-34 (c) (2) (a)4 sets