Use of evidentiary standard did not convert action to equitable proceeding.

- When a party elected to proceed under former Code 1933, § 72-301 (see now O.C.G.A. § 41-2-5), it was an action at law and using the evidentiary standard contained in former Code 1933, § 72-401 (see now O.C.G.A. § 41-3-1) did not convert the proceeding into an equitable one. Yield, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 145 Ga. App. 172, 244 S.E.2d 32, cert. dismissed, 241 Ga. 593, 247 S.E.2d 764 (1978).

Allegations establishing cause of action.

- Petition by the solicitor general (now district attorney) to abate described premises as a public nuisance, alleging that the premises are being maintained and used for the purpose of prostitution and assignation, in violation of this section, et seq., and attaching as a part of the petition affidavits by three persons who testify that the premises have been used as alleged, states a cause of action; a judgment overruling a general demurrer (now motion to dismiss) to the petition is not erroneous. Carpenter v. State ex rel. Hains, 194 Ga. 395, 21 S.E.2d 643 (1942).

Petition, alleging in substance that the defendant was operating a lewd house; was operating and maintaining a gaming house; was illegally selling beer, whiskey and other alcoholic beverages to minors; was maintaining on the defendant's premises a juke box whose loud playing was disturbing the neighborhood and people passing by on the highway; and was providing a gathering place for minors and the general public to drink, dance, and carouse, was sufficient to state a cause of action for abatement of a public nuisance by the solicitor general (now district attorney). Lee v. Hayes, 215 Ga. 330, 110 S.E.2d 624 (1959).

Modification of judgment so as to release building and contents.

- In a proceeding to abate as a nuisance a described tourist camp owned by the defendant on the ground that "said place and its contents" were being knowingly maintained and used by the defendant for the purpose of lewdness, assignation, and prostitution, when the judge, by consent trying the case, without a jury, found and decreed that all of the buildings in the tourist camp, with the personalty in each, were used by the defendant "as one plant or combine" for the purpose of lewdness and prostitution, the defendant, after an affirmance of such judgment by the Supreme Court, could not obtain a modification of the judgment so as to release one of the buildings and the building's contents, by showing that this part of the tourist camp was in no way connected with the alleged nuisance; the original finding and decree as to this matter being conclusive. Carpenter v. State, 195 Ga. 434, 24 S.E.2d 404 (1943).

Cited in Crews v. State ex rel. Hayes, 215 Ga. 698, 113 S.E.2d 116 (1960); Whitehead v. Hasty, 235 Ga. App. 331, 219 S.E.2d 443 (1975); Yield, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 239 Ga. 578, 238 S.E.2d 351 (1977); 660 Lindbergh, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 492 F. Supp. 511 (N.D. Ga. 1980); Gateway Books, Inc. v. State, 247 Ga. 16, 276 S.E.2d 1 (1981).

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 24 Am. Jur. 2d, Disorderly Houses, § 40. 58 Am. Jur. 2d, Nuisances, §§ 39-53, 300.

C.J.S.

- 66 C.J.S., Nuisances, §§ 67, 71-73, 124.

ALR.

- Disorderly character of house as affected by the number of females who reside therein or resort thereto for immoral purposes, 12 A.L.R. 529.

Validity and construction of statute or ordinances forbidding treatment in health clubs or massage salons by persons of the opposite sex, 51 A.L.R.3d 936.

Massage parlor as nuisance, 80 A.L.R.3d 1020.