Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448The Interstate Corrections Compact is enacted into law and entered into by this state with any other states legally joining therein in the form substantially as follows:
The party States, desiring by common action to fully utilize and improve their institutional facilities and provide adequate programs for the confinement, treatment and rehabilitation of various types of offenders, declare that it is the policy of each of the party States to provide such facilities and programs on a basis of cooperation with one another, thereby serving the best interests of such offenders and of society and effecting economies in capital expenditures and operational costs. The purpose of this Compact is to provide for the mutual development and execution of such programs of cooperation for the confinement, treatment and rehabilitation of offenders with the most economical use of human and material resources.
A RTICLE II. DEFINITIONS.
As used in this Compact, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:
A RTICLE III. CONTRACTS.
Any State party to this Compact may accept federal aid for use in connection with any institution or program, the use of which is or may be affected by this Compact or any contract pursuant hereto and any inmate in a receiving State pursuant to this Compact may participate in any such federally aided program or activity for which the sending and receiving States have made contractual provisions; provided, that if such program or activity is not part of the customary correctional regimen, express consent of the appropriate official of the sending State shall be required therefor.
This Compact shall enter into force and become effective and binding upon the States so acting when it has been enacted into law by any two States. Thereafter, this Compact shall enter into force and become effective and binding as to any other of said States upon similar action by such State.
This Compact shall continue in force and remain binding upon a party State until it shall have enacted a statute repealing the same and providing for the sending of formal written notice of withdrawal from the Compact to the appropriate officials of all other party States. An actual withdrawal shall not take effect until one year after the notices provided in said statute have been sent. Such withdrawal shall not relieve the withdrawing State from its obligations assumed hereunder prior to the effective date of withdrawal. Before the effective date of withdrawal, a withdrawing State shall remove to its territory, at its own expense, such inmates as it may have confined pursuant to the provisions of this Compact.
Nothing contained in this Compact shall be construed to abrogate or impair any agreement or other arrangement which a party State may have with a non-party State for the confinement, rehabilitation or treatment of inmates nor to repeal any other laws of a party State authorizing the making of cooperative institutional arrangements.
The provisions of this Compact shall be liberally construed and shall be severable. If any phrase, clause, sentence or provision of this Compact is declared to be contrary to the constitution of any participating State or of the United States or the applicability thereof to any government, agency, person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this Compact and the applicability thereof to any government, agency, person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby. If this Compact shall be held contrary to the constitution of any State participating therein, the Compact shall remain in full force and effect as to the remaining States and in full force and effect as to the State affected as to all severable matters.
A RTICLE IV. PROCEDURES AND RIGHTS.
Whenever the duly constituted authorities in a State party to this Compact, and which has entered into a contract pursuant to Article III, shall decide that confinement in, or transfer of an inmate to, an institution within the territory of another party State is necessary or desirable in order to provide adequate quarters and care or an appropriate program of rehabilitation or treatment, said officials may direct that the confinement be within an institution within the territory of said other party State, the receiving State to act in that regard solely as agent for the sending State.
The appropriate officials of any State party to this Contract shall have access, at all reasonable times, to any institution in which it has a contractual right to confine inmates for the purpose of inspecting the facilities thereof and visiting such of its inmates as may be confined in the institution.
A RTICLE V. ACTS NOT REVIEWABLE IN RECEIVING
STATE; EXTRADITION.
Any decision of the sending State in respect to any matter over which it retains jurisdiction pursuant to this Compact shall be conclusive upon and not reviewable within the receiving State, but if at the time the sending State seeks to remove an inmate from an institution in the receiving State there is pending against the inmate within such State any criminal charge or if the inmate is formally accused of having committed within such State a criminal offense, the inmate shall not be returned without the consent of the receiving State until discharged from prosecution or other form of proceeding, imprisonment or detention for such offense. The duly accredited officers of the sending State shall be permitted to transport inmates pursuant to this Compact through any and all States party to this Compact without interference.
An inmate who escapes from an institution in which he is confined pursuant to this Compact shall be deemed a fugitive from the sending State and from the State in which the institution is situated. In the case of an escape to a jurisdiction other than the sending or receiving State the responsibility for institution of extradition or rendition proceedings shall be that of the sending State, but nothing contained herein shall be construed to prevent or affect the activities of officers and agencies of any jurisdiction directed toward the apprehension and return of an escapee.
A RTICLE VI. FEDERAL AID.
A RTICLE VII. ENTRY INTO FORCE.
A RTICLE VIII. WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION.
A RTICLE IX. OTHER ARRANGEMENTS UNAFFECTED.
A RTICLE X. CONSTRUCTION AND SEVERABILITY.
(Ga. L. 1972, p. 584, § 2.)
- 60 Am. Jur. 2d, Penal and Correctional Institutions, § 131.
- 72 C.J.S., Prisons and Rights of Prisoners, § 133.
- Right to try one for an offense other than that named in extradition proceedings, 21 A.L.R. 1405.
Extradition of escaped or paroled convict, or one at liberty on bail, 78 A.L.R. 419.
Validity, construction, and application of interstate corrections compact and implementing state laws - jurisdictional issues, governing law, and validity and applicability of compact, 54 A.L.R.6th 1.
Construction and application of interstate corrections compact and implementing state laws - equivalency of conditions and rights and responsibilities of parties, 56 A.L.R. 6th 553.
Total Results: 20
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-10-11
Snippet: sentence of life imprisonment imposed under OCGA § 42-1- 12 (n) for the defendant’s second failure to register
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-05-02
Snippet: failure to register as a sex offender under OCGA § 42- 1-12, with one indictment alleging violations in March
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-02-01
Snippet: Offender Registry (the “Registry”), see OCGA §§ 42-1-12 through 42-1-19 (the “Registry Act”), violated
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-10-05
Snippet: imprisonment, followed by probation for life”); 42-1-12 (a) (10) (B.1) (xiv) (defining “dangerous sexual
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-03-04
Citation: 825 S.E.2d 147
Snippet: Board Act, OCGA § 42-1-12 et seq., including its registration requirements (OCGA § 42-1-12 (f) ) and its
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-05-21
Citation: 814 S.E.2d 701
Snippet: requirements imposed upon sex offenders by OCGA § 42-1-12 under its constitutional power "to remove disabilities
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-06-19
Citation: 301 Ga. 391, 801 S.E.2d 821, 2017 WL 2623882, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 532
Snippet: equipment. See OCGA §§ 42-1-12 (i) (12), 42-1-14 (e). Throughout OCGA § 42-1-12, monitoring of other sexual
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-05-15
Citation: 301 Ga. 137, 800 S.E.2d 356, 2017 WL 2061685, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 375
Snippet: 72 hours of the change as required under OCGA § 42-1-12, contrary to the laws of said State, the good order
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-11-30
Citation: 300 Ga. 312, 794 S.E.2d 613, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 780
Snippet: required to register as a sexual offender. See OCGA § 42-1-12. Pursuant to OCGA § 42-1-19 (a) (4), Yelverton
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-03-21
Citation: 298 Ga. 675, 784 S.E.2d 392, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 242
Snippet: Georgia sexual offender registration laws, OCGA §42-1-12 et seq. 1 Scott Gregory is a convicted
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-01-19
Citation: 298 Ga. 375, 781 S.E.2d 781, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 85, 2016 WL 225016
Snippet: registration requirements prescribed at OCGA § 42-1-12. In this case, we granted the State’s petition
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-11-17
Citation: 296 Ga. 256, 765 S.E.2d 909, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 908
Snippet: offender registration requirement. See OCGA [§] 42-1-12 [(a) (9) (C), (a) (10) (C)] (exempting misdemeanors
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-10-15
Citation: 291 Ga. 754, 732 S.E.2d 441, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 3194, 2012 WL 4857205, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 788
Snippet: to register as a sexual offender under OCGA § 42-1-12 (e) (4), and he appeals, *755arguing that the statute
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-10-03
Citation: 716 S.E.2d 154, 289 Ga. 758, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3067, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 707, 2011 WL 4532671
Snippet: requirements such as those contained in OCGA § 42-1-12 are regulatory, and not punitive, in nature." Rainer
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-11-08
Citation: 702 S.E.2d 865, 288 Ga. 169, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3628, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 854
Snippet: his life is an illegal sentence because OCGA § 42-1-12 (a) (9) (B) (xi), which authorizes a sentencing
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-06-28
Citation: 696 S.E.2d 642, 287 Ga. 389, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2079, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 497
Snippet: register as a sex offender as required by [OCGA § 42-1-12]. The defendant is required to review the requirements
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-15
Citation: 690 S.E.2d 827, 286 Ga. 675, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 762, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 229
Snippet: register as a sexual offender pursuant to OCGA § 42-1-12.1 On December 17, 2008, Rainer filed a declaratory
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-15
Citation: 694 S.E.2d 316, 287 Ga. 63, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 732, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 227
Snippet: first offenders from possessing a firearm); OCGA § 42-1-12 (a) (8) (requiring first offenders charged with
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-11-23
Citation: 686 S.E.2d 772, 286 Ga. 238, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3660, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 736
Snippet: revoking his probation, to determine whether OCGA § 42-1-12 violates constitutional guarantees of due process
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-01-12
Citation: 671 S.E.2d 837, 284 Ga. 788, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 162, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 22
Snippet: as a convicted sex offender, pursuant to OCGA § 42-1-12(f)(5).[1] For the reasons that follow, we affirm