Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 42-11-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 42 PENAL INSTITUTIONS

Section 11. Interstate Corrections Compact, 42-11-1 through 42-11-3.

ARTICLE 5 FEES

42-11-2. Enactment and text of compact.

The Interstate Corrections Compact is enacted into law and entered into by this state with any other states legally joining therein in the form substantially as follows:

INTERSTATE CORRECTIONS COMPACT ARTICLE I. PURPOSE AND POLICY.

The party States, desiring by common action to fully utilize and improve their institutional facilities and provide adequate programs for the confinement, treatment and rehabilitation of various types of offenders, declare that it is the policy of each of the party States to provide such facilities and programs on a basis of cooperation with one another, thereby serving the best interests of such offenders and of society and effecting economies in capital expenditures and operational costs. The purpose of this Compact is to provide for the mutual development and execution of such programs of cooperation for the confinement, treatment and rehabilitation of offenders with the most economical use of human and material resources.

A RTICLE II. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this Compact, unless the context clearly requires otherwise:

  1. "State" means a State of the United States, the United States of America, a Territory or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;
  2. "Sending State" means a State party to this Compact in which conviction or court commitment was had;
  3. "Receiving State" means a State party to this Compact to which an inmate is sent for confinement other than a State in which conviction or a court commitment was had;
  4. "Inmate" means a male or female offender who is committed, under sentence to or confined in a penal or correctional institution;
  5. "Institution" means any penal or correctional facility, including but not limited to a facility for the mentally ill or mentally defective, in which inmates as defined in (4) above may lawfully be confined.

A RTICLE III. CONTRACTS.

  1. Each party State may make one or more contracts with any one or more of the other party States for the confinement of inmates on behalf of a sending State in institutions situated within receiving States. Any such contract shall provide for:
    1. its duration;
    2. payments to be made to the receiving State by the sending State for inmate maintenance, extraordinary medical and dental expenses, and any participation in or receipt by inmates of rehabilitative or correctional services, facilities, programs, or treatment not reasonably included as part of normal maintenance;
    3. participation in programs of inmate employment, if any; the disposition or crediting of any payments received by inmates on account thereof; and the crediting of proceeds from or disposal of any products resulting therefrom;
    4. delivery and retaking of inmates;
    5. such other matters as may be necessary and appropriate to fix the obligations, responsibilities and rights of the sending and receiving States.
  2. The terms and provisions of this Compact shall be a part of any contract entered into by the authority of or pursuant thereto, and nothing in any such contract shall be inconsistent therewith.
  3. Inmates confined in an institution pursuant to the terms of this Compact shall at all times be subject to the jurisdiction of the sending State and may at any time be removed therefrom for transfer to a prison or other institution within the sending State, for transfer to another institution in which the sending State may have a contractual or other right to confine inmates, for release on probation or parole, for discharge, or for any other purpose permitted by the laws of the sending State; provided, that the sending State shall continue to be obligated to such payments as may be required pursuant to the terms of any contract entered into under Article III.
  4. Each receiving State shall provide regular reports to each sending State on the inmates of that sending State in institutions pursuant to this Compact including a conduct record of each inmate and certify said record to the official designated by the sending State, in order that each inmate may have official review of his or her record in determining and altering the disposition of said inmate in accordance with the law which may obtain in the sending State and in order that the same may be a source of information for the sending State.
  5. All inmates who may be confined in an institution pursuant to the provisions of this Compact shall be treated in a reasonable and humane manner and shall be treated equally with similar inmates of the receiving State as may be confined in the same institution. The fact of confinement in a receiving State shall not deprive any inmate so confined of any legal rights which said inmate would have had if confined in an appropriate institution of the sending State.
  6. Any hearing or hearings to which an inmate confined pursuant to this Compact may be entitled by the laws of the sending State may be had before the appropriate authorities of the sending State, or of the receiving State if authorized by the sending State. The receiving State shall provide adequate facilities for such hearings as may be conducted by the appropriate officials of a sending State. In the event such hearing or hearings are had before officials of the receiving State, the governing law shall be that of the sending State and a record of the hearing or hearings as prescribed by the sending State shall be made. Said record together with any recommendations of the hearing officials shall be transmitted forthwith to the official or officials before whom the hearing would have been had if it had taken place in the sending State. In any and all proceedings had pursuant to the provisions of this subdivision, the officials of the receiving State shall act solely as agents of the sending State and no final determination shall be made in any manner except by the appropriate officials of the sending State.
  7. Any inmate confined pursuant to this Compact shall be released within the territory of the sending State unless the inmate, and the sending and receiving States, shall agree upon release in some other place. The sending State shall bear the cost of such return to its territory.
  8. Any inmate confined pursuant to the terms of this Compact shall have any and all rights to participate in and derive any benefits or incur or be relieved of any obligations or have such obligations modified or his status changed on account of any action or proceeding in which he could have participated if confined in any appropriate institution of the sending State located within such State.
  9. The parent, guardian, trustee, or other person or persons entitled under the laws of the sending State to act for, advise, or otherwise function with respect to any inmate shall not be deprived of or restricted in his exercise of any power in respect to any inmate confined pursuant to the terms of this Compact.

    Any State party to this Compact may accept federal aid for use in connection with any institution or program, the use of which is or may be affected by this Compact or any contract pursuant hereto and any inmate in a receiving State pursuant to this Compact may participate in any such federally aided program or activity for which the sending and receiving States have made contractual provisions; provided, that if such program or activity is not part of the customary correctional regimen, express consent of the appropriate official of the sending State shall be required therefor.

    This Compact shall enter into force and become effective and binding upon the States so acting when it has been enacted into law by any two States. Thereafter, this Compact shall enter into force and become effective and binding as to any other of said States upon similar action by such State.

    This Compact shall continue in force and remain binding upon a party State until it shall have enacted a statute repealing the same and providing for the sending of formal written notice of withdrawal from the Compact to the appropriate officials of all other party States. An actual withdrawal shall not take effect until one year after the notices provided in said statute have been sent. Such withdrawal shall not relieve the withdrawing State from its obligations assumed hereunder prior to the effective date of withdrawal. Before the effective date of withdrawal, a withdrawing State shall remove to its territory, at its own expense, such inmates as it may have confined pursuant to the provisions of this Compact.

    Nothing contained in this Compact shall be construed to abrogate or impair any agreement or other arrangement which a party State may have with a non-party State for the confinement, rehabilitation or treatment of inmates nor to repeal any other laws of a party State authorizing the making of cooperative institutional arrangements.

    The provisions of this Compact shall be liberally construed and shall be severable. If any phrase, clause, sentence or provision of this Compact is declared to be contrary to the constitution of any participating State or of the United States or the applicability thereof to any government, agency, person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this Compact and the applicability thereof to any government, agency, person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby. If this Compact shall be held contrary to the constitution of any State participating therein, the Compact shall remain in full force and effect as to the remaining States and in full force and effect as to the State affected as to all severable matters.

A RTICLE IV. PROCEDURES AND RIGHTS.

Whenever the duly constituted authorities in a State party to this Compact, and which has entered into a contract pursuant to Article III, shall decide that confinement in, or transfer of an inmate to, an institution within the territory of another party State is necessary or desirable in order to provide adequate quarters and care or an appropriate program of rehabilitation or treatment, said officials may direct that the confinement be within an institution within the territory of said other party State, the receiving State to act in that regard solely as agent for the sending State.

The appropriate officials of any State party to this Contract shall have access, at all reasonable times, to any institution in which it has a contractual right to confine inmates for the purpose of inspecting the facilities thereof and visiting such of its inmates as may be confined in the institution.

A RTICLE V. ACTS NOT REVIEWABLE IN RECEIVING

STATE; EXTRADITION.

Any decision of the sending State in respect to any matter over which it retains jurisdiction pursuant to this Compact shall be conclusive upon and not reviewable within the receiving State, but if at the time the sending State seeks to remove an inmate from an institution in the receiving State there is pending against the inmate within such State any criminal charge or if the inmate is formally accused of having committed within such State a criminal offense, the inmate shall not be returned without the consent of the receiving State until discharged from prosecution or other form of proceeding, imprisonment or detention for such offense. The duly accredited officers of the sending State shall be permitted to transport inmates pursuant to this Compact through any and all States party to this Compact without interference.

An inmate who escapes from an institution in which he is confined pursuant to this Compact shall be deemed a fugitive from the sending State and from the State in which the institution is situated. In the case of an escape to a jurisdiction other than the sending or receiving State the responsibility for institution of extradition or rendition proceedings shall be that of the sending State, but nothing contained herein shall be construed to prevent or affect the activities of officers and agencies of any jurisdiction directed toward the apprehension and return of an escapee.

A RTICLE VI. FEDERAL AID.

A RTICLE VII. ENTRY INTO FORCE.

A RTICLE VIII. WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION.

A RTICLE IX. OTHER ARRANGEMENTS UNAFFECTED.

A RTICLE X. CONSTRUCTION AND SEVERABILITY.

(Ga. L. 1972, p. 584, § 2.)

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 60 Am. Jur. 2d, Penal and Correctional Institutions, § 131.

C.J.S.

- 72 C.J.S., Prisons and Rights of Prisoners, § 133.

ALR.

- Right to try one for an offense other than that named in extradition proceedings, 21 A.L.R. 1405.

Extradition of escaped or paroled convict, or one at liberty on bail, 78 A.L.R. 419.

Validity, construction, and application of interstate corrections compact and implementing state laws - jurisdictional issues, governing law, and validity and applicability of compact, 54 A.L.R.6th 1.

Construction and application of interstate corrections compact and implementing state laws - equivalency of conditions and rights and responsibilities of parties, 56 A.L.R. 6th 553.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 42-11-2 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 20

Sosebee v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-10-11

Snippet: sentence of life imprisonment imposed under OCGA § 42-1- 12 (n) for the defendant’s second failure to register

Session v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-05-02

Snippet: failure to register as a sex offender under OCGA § 42- 1-12, with one indictment alleging violations in March

GARDEI v. CONWAY

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-02-01

Snippet: Offender Registry (the “Registry”), see OCGA §§ 42-1-12 through 42-1-19 (the “Registry Act”), violated

EMMONS, WARDEN v. BRYANT 10-12-2021 Substitute Opinion Issued.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-10-05

Snippet: imprisonment, followed by probation for life”); 42-1-12 (a) (10) (B.1) (xiv) (defining “dangerous sexual

Park v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-03-04

Citation: 825 S.E.2d 147

Snippet: Board Act, OCGA § 42-1-12 et seq., including its registration requirements (OCGA § 42-1-12 (f) ) and its

State v. Davis

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-05-21

Citation: 814 S.E.2d 701

Snippet: requirements imposed upon sex offenders by OCGA § 42-1-12 under its constitutional power "to remove disabilities

Sexual Offender Registration Review Board v. Berzett

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-06-19

Citation: 301 Ga. 391, 801 S.E.2d 821, 2017 WL 2623882, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 532

Snippet: equipment. See OCGA §§ 42-1-12 (i) (12), 42-1-14 (e). Throughout OCGA § 42-1-12, monitoring of other sexual

Jackson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-05-15

Citation: 301 Ga. 137, 800 S.E.2d 356, 2017 WL 2061685, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 375

Snippet: 72 hours of the change as required under OCGA § 42-1-12, contrary to the laws of said State, the good order

Yelverton v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-11-30

Citation: 300 Ga. 312, 794 S.E.2d 613, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 780

Snippet: required to register as a sexual offender. See OCGA § 42-1-12. Pursuant to OCGA § 42-1-19 (a) (4), Yelverton

Gregory v. Sexual Offender Registration Review Board

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-03-21

Citation: 298 Ga. 675, 784 S.E.2d 392, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 242

Snippet: Georgia sexual offender registration laws, OCGA §42-1-12 et seq. 1 Scott Gregory is a convicted

State v. Randle

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-01-19

Citation: 298 Ga. 375, 781 S.E.2d 781, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 85, 2016 WL 225016

Snippet: registration requirements prescribed at OCGA § 42-1-12. In this case, we granted the State’s petition

Owens v. Urbina

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-11-17

Citation: 296 Ga. 256, 765 S.E.2d 909, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 908

Snippet: offender registration requirement. See OCGA [§] 42-1-12 [(a) (9) (C), (a) (10) (C)] (exempting misdemeanors

Youmans v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-10-15

Citation: 291 Ga. 754, 732 S.E.2d 441, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 3194, 2012 WL 4857205, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 788

Snippet: to register as a sexual offender under OCGA § 42-1-12 (e) (4), and he appeals, *755arguing that the statute

Stephens v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-10-03

Citation: 716 S.E.2d 154, 289 Ga. 758, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 3067, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 707, 2011 WL 4532671

Snippet: requirements such as those contained in OCGA § 42-1-12 are regulatory, and not punitive, in nature." Rainer

Wiggins v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-11-08

Citation: 702 S.E.2d 865, 288 Ga. 169, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3628, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 854

Snippet: his life is an illegal sentence because OCGA § 42-1-12 (a) (9) (B) (xi), which authorizes a sentencing

Hollie v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-06-28

Citation: 696 S.E.2d 642, 287 Ga. 389, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2079, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 497

Snippet: register as a sex offender as required by [OCGA § 42-1-12]. The defendant is required to review the requirements

Rainer v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-15

Citation: 690 S.E.2d 827, 286 Ga. 675, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 762, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 229

Snippet: register as a sexual offender pursuant to OCGA § 42-1-12.1 On December 17, 2008, Rainer filed a declaratory

Humphreys v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-15

Citation: 694 S.E.2d 316, 287 Ga. 63, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 732, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 227

Snippet: first offenders from possessing a firearm); OCGA § 42-1-12 (a) (8) (requiring first offenders charged with

Dunn v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-11-23

Citation: 686 S.E.2d 772, 286 Ga. 238, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3660, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 736

Snippet: revoking his probation, to determine whether OCGA § 42-1-12 violates constitutional guarantees of due process

Thomas v. Warren

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-01-12

Citation: 671 S.E.2d 837, 284 Ga. 788, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 162, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 22

Snippet: as a convicted sex offender, pursuant to OCGA § 42-1-12(f)(5).[1] For the reasons that follow, we affirm