Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 42-5-37 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 42-5-37 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 42-5-37

TITLE 42 PENAL INSTITUTIONS

Section 5. Correctional Institutions of State and Counties, 42-5-1 through 42-5-125.

ARTICLE 2 WARDENS, SUPERINTENDENTS, AND OTHER PERSONNEL

42-5-37. Employees in control of inmates prohibited from receiving profit from inmate labor; penalties.

  1. No warden, superintendent, deputy, inspector, physician, or any officer or other employee who has charge, control, or direction of inmates shall be interested in any manner whatever in the work or profit of the labor of any inmate; nor shall any such personnel receive any pay, gift, gratuity, or favor of a valuable character from any person interested, either directly or indirectly, in such labor.
  2. Any person violating subsection (a) of this Code section shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of not less than two years and not more than five years. The offense may be reduced to a misdemeanor by recommendation of the jury trying the case, if the court concurs in the jury's recommendation. In addition, a person who violates subsection (a) of this Code section shall be summarily discharged from the service of the state by the department.
  3. This Code section shall not prohibit a part-time professional employee from the regular practice of his profession.

(Ga. L. 1908, p. 1119, § 11; Penal Code 1910, § 1196; Code 1933, § 77-9906; Ga. L. 1984, p. 639, § 3.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Constitutionality of subsection (a).

- While it is commonly understood that a warden will have a permissible interest in the performance of labor by inmates under the waarden's control as that labor benefits the county or state, the clear meaning of O.C.G.A. § 42-5-37 is that a warden may not receive a personal interest or benefit from the labor of inmates under the warden's control. Therefore, subsection (a) is not void for vagueness. Cleveland v. State, 260 Ga. 770, 399 S.E.2d 472 (1991).

Warden's use of inmate labor for personal benefit.

- Although, as warden, the defendant was permitted to live rent-free in a house located on county property, the county did not benefit from routine use of inmates to perform personal housekeeping chores at the warden's home, as well as to walk the warden's dogs and clean the dog pens, baby-sit the warden's children, and wash the warden's personal vehicles. Inmates who refused to perform these chores were punished. The extensive evidence that the warden directed inmates to perform labor for the warden's personal benefit supports the warden's convictions for violating subsection (a) of O.C.G.A. § 42-5-37 beyond a reasonable doubt. Cleveland v. State, 260 Ga. 770, 399 S.E.2d 472 (1991).

Cited in Smith v. Deering, 880 F. Supp. 816 (S.D. Ga. 1994).

API Error: Request was throttled. Expected available in 3 seconds.

No results found for Georgia Code 42-5-37.