O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 42-8-35.2 (2019)

Special term of probation; when imposed; revocation; suspension

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, the court, when imposing a sentence of imprisonment after a conviction of a violation of subsection (b) or (d) of Code Section 16-13-30 or after a conviction of a violation of Code Section 16-13-31, shall impose a special term of probation of three years in addition to such term of imprisonment; provided, however, that, upon a second or subsequent conviction of a violation of the provisions of such Code sections, the special term of probation shall be six years in addition to any term of imprisonment. (b) A special term of probation imposed under this Code section may be revoked if the terms and conditions of probation are violated. In such circumstances the original term of imprisonment shall be increased by the period of the special term of probation and the resulting new term of imprisonment shall not be diminished by the time which was spent on special probation. A person whose special term of probation has been revoked may be required to serve all or part of the remainder of the new term of imprisonment. A special term of probation provided for in this Code section shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other probation provided for by law and shall be supervised in the same manner as other probations as provided in this chapter. (c) Upon written application by the probationer to the trial court, the court may, in its discretion, suspend the balance of any special term of probation, provided that at least one-half of such special term of probation has been completed and all fines associated with the original sentence have been paid and all other terms of the original sentence and the terms of the special probation have been met by the probationer.

History

Ga. L. 1982, p. 2283, § 1; Code 1981, § 42-8-35.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1982, p. 2283, § 2; Code 1981, § 42-8-35.2, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1983, p. 3, § 31; Ga. L. 1997, p. 143, § 42; Ga. L. 2015, p. 422, § 4-1/HB 310; Ga. L. 2023, p. 730, § 5(b)(3)/HB 475, effective July 1, 2023. The 2023 amendment, effective July 1, 2023, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, revised punctuation in the proviso at the end of subsection (a).

Annotations

Editor’s notes. The 1983 amendment, effective Janu-

ary 25, 1983, redesignated this Code section, which was enacted as Code Section 42-8-35.1, as Code Section 42-8-35.2, since Ga. L. 1982, p. 1097, § 2 also enacted a Code Section 42-8-35.1, and revised language. Ga. L. 2015, p. 422, § 6-1/HB 310, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: “This Act shall become effective July 1, 2015, and shall apply to sentences entered on or after such date.” Law reviews. For article on the 2015 amendment of this Code section, see 32 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 231 (2015).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Special probation properly imposed. - Plain language of O.C.G.A. § 42-8-35.2(a) requires that a term of special probation be served “in addition to any term of imprisonment” rendered under O.C.G.A. § 16-13-30(d); thus, the two statutes do not conflict. Accordingly, a defendant was properly sentenced to a ten-year incarceration followed by special probation, and the defendant’s claim that O.C.G.A. § 42-8-32.5 was implicitly repealed by the 1996 amendment to O.C.G.A. § 16-13-30 was without merit. Mike v. State, 290 Ga. App. 214, 659 S.E.2d 664, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 283 (2008), cert. denied, No. S08C1196, 2008

Ga. LEXIS 612 (Ga. June 16, 2008), overruled in part, Langley v. State, 313 Ga. 141, 868 S.E.2d 759, 2022 Ga. LEXIS 14 (2022). Defendant’s sentence for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute of 30 years, with the first 20 years to be served in confinement and the remainder to be served on probation, along with a special term of probation of three years in addition to the 30-year term, was valid under O.C.G.A. §§ 16-13-30(d) and 42-835.2. Benton v. State, 356 Ga. App. 441, 847 S.E.2d 625, 2020 Ga. App. LEXIS 460 (2020), cert. denied, No. S21C0110, 2021 Ga. LEXIS 253 (Ga. Apr. 5, 2021).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Defendant’s right to credit for time spent in halfway house, rehabilitation

center, or other restrictive environment as condition of probation, 24 A.L.R.4th 789.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2020 · leading case: Mike v. State, 659 S.E.2d 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008).
Mike v. State, 659 S.E.2d 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 6× “The state also argued that the trial court was required by OCGA§ 42-8-35.2 (a) to follow Mike’s sentence of imprisonment with a special period of probation.”
Robert Benton, Jr. v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 16× “OCGA § 42-8-35.2 (a) pertinently provides that “when imposing a sentence of imprisonment after a conviction of a violation of [OCGA § 16-13-30 (d), 8 a court] shall impose a special term of probation of three years in addition to such term of imprisonment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.