Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1943, p. 185, § 10; Ga. L. 1997, p. 556, § 1.)
- If being a member of the Democratic executive committee made the defendant the holder of an "office" at the time of the defendant's appointment as a member of the State Board of Pardons and Paroles, the defendant would not thereby forfeit the defendant's appointment as a member of such board. McLendon v. Everett, 205 Ga. 713, 55 S.E.2d 119 (1949).
- Statute does not declare that, if a member of the board shall serve as a representative of a political party, or engage in any other business or profession, the member shall thereby forfeit the member's office. The General Assembly might have provided that a member of the Democratic executive committee could not be appointed as a member of the board, and might have declared a member of the committee to be ineligible for appointment on the board. The legislature did not do this. The legislature provided that a member of the board should not serve as an executive officer or employee of any political committee. McLendon v. Everett, 205 Ga. 713, 55 S.E.2d 119 (1949); McLendon v. Wilburn, 206 Ga. 646, 58 S.E.2d 423 (1950).
- This section does not include any qualification of membership or any penalty by forfeiture of office for engaging in another business or profession. Partain v. Maddox, 227 Ga. 623, 182 S.E.2d 450 (1971).
- Termination of plaintiff's position as a parole review officer of the board of pardons and paroles after the plaintiff's election to county and state political party committees does not violate the plaintiff's constitutional rights of due process and equal protection or the plaintiff's constitutionally protected rights of political speech and association. MacKenzie v. Snow, 675 F. Supp. 1333 (N.D. Ga. 1987).
No modification by O.C.G.A. § 45-10-70. - O.C.G.A. § 45-10-70 does not expressly or impliedly repeal O.C.G.A. § 42-9-15. It is reasonable for the General Assembly to loosen its limitations on political activity for state employees generally in the first provision, while continuing to prohibit pardon and parole board members and employees from engaging in political activity in the second provision. MacKenzie v. Snow, 675 F. Supp. 1333 (N.D. Ga. 1987).
No modification by § 45-10-70. - O.C.G.A. § 45-10-70 does not repeal, supersede, or otherwise modify O.C.G.A. § 45-9-15 as it applies to the political activities of a full-time employee of the State Board of Pardons and Paroles since § 45-10-70 only prohibits the promulgation of rules and regulations affecting an employee's ability to engage in certain political activity. 1987 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 87-16.
- Violation of the Merit System rules governing political activity or violation of O.C.G.A. § 45-9-15 by a classified employee can be used as a valid basis for disciplinary action (including dismissal) or forfeiture of the position under the rules. 1987 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 87-16.
- 63A Am. Jur. 2d, Public Officers and Employees, §§ 36, 37, 39, 40, 64 et seq., 68 et seq., 77.
No results found for Georgia Code 42-9-15.