Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448On the trial of anyone charged with the violation of this chapter or with the illegal practice of dentistry, it shall be incumbent on the defendant, upon proof that he or she practiced dentistry, to show that he or she had authority under the law to practice dentistry in order to exempt himself or herself from the penalty for such violation.
(Ga. L. 1920, p. 132, § 24; Code 1933, § 84-9911; Ga. L. 1999, p. 234, § 18.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, §§ 84-701, 84-9909, 84-9911, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- When the state made out a case by proving that the defendant practiced dentistry in Georgia without having obtained a license from the board, this proof cast the burden upon the defendant to prove a right to so practice, the law makes the having of a license or other authority to practice dentistry at the time of the passage of former Code 1933, Ch. 84-7 (see now O.C.G.A. Ch. 11, T. 43) a matter of defense. Jordan v. State, 77 Ga. App. 700, 49 S.E.2d 694 (1948) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 84-701, 84-9909, 84-9911).
No results found for Georgia Code 43-11-49.