Valid claims for damages for failure to provide lodging.

- Based on the innkeeper's refusal to provide lodging for the disabled individual and the individual's service dog, the individual's proposed amended complaint stated valid claims for damages under O.C.G.A. §§ 30-4-2 and43-21-3; the amendment was not futile, and leave to amend pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) was granted. Amick v. BM & KM, Inc., 275 F. Supp. 2d 1378 (N.D. Ga. 2003).

Cited in Walker v. State, 220 Ga. 415, 139 S.E.2d 278 (1964); Brown v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 133 Ga. App. 286, 211 S.E.2d 125 (1974).

ALR.

- Improper motive or purpose in going to hotel as affecting one's status as guest, or invitee of a guest, for purpose of determining degree of care owed by proprietor, 16 A.L.R. 1388.

Exclusion of person (for reason other than color or race) from place of public entertainment or amusement, 1 A.L.R.2d 1165.

Punitive damages for wrongful ejection or rejection of guest from hotel or restaurant, 14 A.L.R.2d 715.

Civil rights: actionability under state statutes of discrimination because of complaining party's association with persons of different race, color, or the like, 35 A.L.R.3d 859.

Hotel or innkeeper's liability for refusal to honor reservation, 58 A.L.R.3d 369.

Recovery of damages as remedy for wrongful discrimination under state or local civil rights provisions, 85 A.L.R.3d 351.

What constitutes private club or association not otherwise open to public that is exempt from state civil rights statute, 83 A.L.R.5th 467.