O.C.G.A.

43-22A-1 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Georgia Lactation Consultant Practice Act.”

History

Code 1981, § 43-22A-1, enacted by Ga. L. 2016, p. 357, § 1/HB 649.

Annotations

Cross references. Newborn Baby and Mother Protection Act, § 33-24-58.2.

Medicaid coverage for lactation and postpartum care, § 49-4-159.

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Access to database. - Registered nurses and licensed practical nurses cannot access the GAPDMP database as dispensers or as practitioners authorized to dispense under the Georgia Prescription

Drug Monitoring Program, but nurses may be able to access the GAPDMP database as delegates of physicians who do have the authority to prescribe or dispense. 2016 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 16-7.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2023 · leading case: Raffensperger v. Jackson (& Vice Versa), 888 S.E.2d 483 (Ga. 2023).
Raffensperger v. Jackson (& Vice Versa), 888 S.E.2d 483 (Ga. 2023). · cites it 6× “(“ROSE”), filed a complaint against the Secretary of State (“the Secretary”),1 challenging the constitutionality of the Georgia Lactation Consultant Practice Act (“the Act”), OCGA §§ 43-22A-1 to 43-22A-13. Under the Act, the Secretary issues licenses authorizing lactation care…”
Jackson v. Raffensperger, 843 S.E.2d 576 (Ga. 2020). “(“ROSE”), filed a complaint against the Secretary of State challenging the constitutionality of the Georgia Lactation Consultant Practice Act (the “Act”), OCGA §§ 43-22A-1 to 43-22A-13, which prohibits the practice of “lactation care and services” for compensation without a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.