O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 43-35-1 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Georgia Podiatry Practice Act.’’

History

Code 1981, § 43-35-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1994, p. 1375, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2021 · leading case: Hewett v. Kalish, 442 S.E.2d 233 (Ga. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hewett v. Kalish, 442 S.E.2d 233 (Ga. 1994). · cites it 3× “A podiatrist practices medicine of the foot, see OCGA § 43-35-1 (2), and the only reason a podiatrist does not hold a full medical license under OCGA § 43-34-20 (3) is that the practice of medicine is not limited to any one area of the body, Shaw v.”
United States v. Arnita Avery-Kelly (11th Cir. 2021). “See O.C.G.A. § 43-35-1 et seq. And Georgia podiatrists are governed by the rules of the Georgia Board of Podiatry Examiners, which has promulgated no rules about the PDMP.”
United States v. Arnita Avery-Kelly (11th Cir. 2021). “See O.C.G.A. § 43-35-1 et seq. And Georgia podiatrists are governed by the rules of the Georgia Board of Podiatry Examiners, which has promulgated no rules about the PDMP.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.