Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(8.1) Any person employed on a full-time basis by a community association for the purpose of providing community association management services;
Any broker utilizing the services of such an employee shall be held responsible under this chapter for the activities of that individual;
(Ga. L. 1925, p. 325, § 2; Code 1933, § 84-1403; Ga. L. 1965, p. 629, § 3; Ga. L. 1973, p. 100, § 1; Ga. L. 1980, p. 1398, § 2; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 43; Ga. L. 1985, p. 360, § 18; Ga. L. 1986, p. 364, §§ 14, 15; Ga. L. 1989, p. 1619, § 9; Ga. L. 1995, p. 1216, § 9; Ga. L. 1996, p. 194, § 13; Ga. L. 2003, p. 370, § 18; Ga. L. 2005, p. 1030, § 12/SB 55.)
- For annual survey on law of real property, see 43 Mercer L. Rev. 353 (1991). For annual survey article on real property law, see 52 Mercer L. Rev. 383 (2000).
- By enacting former Code 1933, §§ 84-1426, 84-1402 and 84-1403 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 43-40-1,43-40-29, and43-40-30), the legislature intended to require a person to obtain a license before procuring real property purchasers in return for compensation. Berchenko v. Fulton Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 149 Ga. App. 526, 254 S.E.2d 745, aff'd, 244 Ga. 733, 261 S.E.2d 643 (1979).
Legislature intended to exempt owner regardless of any encumbrance upon the owner's land from any provisions of law applicable to brokers and salespeople of real estate. Gray v. Georgia Real Estate Comm'n, 209 Ga. 301, 71 S.E.2d 645 (1952).
Commission has no power to require owners of land to procure licenses before selling land, or to otherwise interfere with complete freedom of such owners in sale of the owners' own land. Gray v. Georgia Real Estate Comm'n, 209 Ga. 301, 71 S.E.2d 645 (1952).
- Those who merely refer one person to another are exempted from the licensure requirement; however, if a fee, commission, or other valuable consideration is promised or intended to be paid for the referral service, by definition the referral agent is a broker and must be licensed. Berchenko v. Fulton Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 244 Ga. 733, 261 S.E.2d 643 (1979).
§ 43-40-29(a)(1) or (a)(7), even though co-owner. - Phrase "as owner" in this section was construed to mean in capacity as owner. When the plaintiffs were suing in the plaintiffs' capacities as brokers, even though the plaintiffs were also incidentally co-owners, these exclusions did not apply. Pendley v. Jessee, 134 Ga. App. 138, 213 S.E.2d 496 (1975).
- Mere absence of specific statutory provision for situations of joint owners acting as brokers does not warrant conclusion that such owners are not entitled to act as brokers for their co-owners and to enforce their contractual right to broker's commissions. Pendley v. Jessee, 134 Ga. App. 138, 213 S.E.2d 496 (1975).
- When a former employee alleged that the employee was entitled to quantum meruit against the former employer for having found a buyer for the employer's property, for which the employer had orally indicated that the employer would reward the employee, but the employee failed to raise in the trial court that the employee was a referral agent who was exempt from the real estate licensing statutes pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 43-40-29(a)(9), the issue was not reviewable on appeal; thus, summary judgment under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-56(c) was granted to the employer as the employee was not licensed under O.C.G.A. §§ 43-40-1(2)(A) and43-40-30(a). The true nature of the exchange was a sale of real estate and an agreement was prohibited by the licensing statutes; accordingly, it could not be the basis of a quantum meruit claim. Everett v. Goodloe, 268 Ga. App. 536, 602 S.E.2d 284 (2004).
Person suing as qualified for the exception under O.C.G.A. § 43-40-29(a)(8) was not entitled to compensation since the person's claim was based wholly on an expectation of a commission for providing real estate brokerage services. Johnson v. Oriental Weavers Rug Mfg. Co., 241 Ga. App. 15, 525 S.E.2d 738 (1999).
- Apartment management firm which was employed directly or indirectly by the owner of the property to perform daily management duties was excepted under O.C.G.A. § 43-40-29(a)(8) from the licensing requirements of O.C.G.A. T. 43, C. 40. Piedmont Eng'g & Constr. Corp. v. Balcor Partners-84 II, Inc., 196 Ga. App. 486, 396 S.E.2d 279 (1990), cert. denied, 196 Ga. App. 909, 396 S.E.2d 279 (1990).
- In the plaintiff's suit in connection with referral services the plaintiff provided to the defendant in a real estate transaction, the defendant's motion for summary judgment was properly denied as the real estate licensure requirement did not bar the plaintiff from bringing an action to recover commissions or compensation for the referral services because the plaintiff's actions permitted the plaintiff to recover a referral fee under an exception as the defendant expressly offered the plaintiff a referral fee if the plaintiff located a bona fide buyer; the plaintiff located a bona fide buyer; the buyer closed on the sale; and the plaintiff did not receive a referral fee from the party being referred or charge an advance fee. Oconee Inv. Group, LLC v. Turk, 344 Ga. App. 31, 807 S.E.2d 512 (2017).
Cited in Newborn v. Trust Co. Bank, 148 Ga. App. 70, 251 S.E.2d 45 (1978); Krizan v. Newman & Co., 153 Ga. App. 337, 265 S.E.2d 68 (1980).
- This section did not except from statutory provisions brokers or salespeople when dealing with their own property. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-101.
- If a broker sells personal real estate through a brokerage company, or otherwise represents to prospective purchasers that the purchasers are dealing with a licensed broker, the broker may employ only licensed salespersons to make such sales on the broker's behalf. 1977 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 77-26.
Employees negotiating agreements for property management company must be licensed. 1977 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 77-26.
- Even though the general partner in a limited partnership need not be licensed to manage the property owned by the limited partnership, if licensed, the general partner must account for funds and management responsibilities as all other licenses. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-80.
To the extent the general partner in a limited partnership manages the property owned by the partnership full time and receives no separate fee, commission, or salary for the brokerage aspects of this management, it would appear that the general partner is excepted from the licensure and regulatory requirements under O.C.G.A. § 43-40-29(a)(7), but if the general partner also managed the property of others, that exception would not apply and that person would be required to be licensed by the commission. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-80.
- Exceptions to licensure for employees do not contemplate dual employment since the exceptions reference "regular" or "full-time" employment. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-80.
- Individual, firm, or corporation may use the name "realty" and may actually deal in real estate without obtaining a license from the Georgia Real Estate Commission provided that such person, firm, or corporation does not for another and for a fee, commission, or other valuable consideration, sell, exchange, buy, rent, or offer or attempt to negotiate a sale, exchange, purchase or rental of any estate or interest in real estate or collect or offer or attempt to collect rent for the use of real estate. 1950-51 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 150.
- Implied contract of employment of real estate broker to procure customer, 49 A.L.R. 933.
Application and effect of statute relating to real estate brokers as regards broker from out of state, 86 A.L.R. 640; 159 A.L.R. 274.
Who is real-estate agent, salesman, or broker within meaning of statute, 167 A.L.R. 774.
Single or isolated transactions as falling within provisions of commercial or occupational licensing requirements, 93 A.L.R.2d 90.
No results found for Georgia Code 43-40-29.