Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1921, p. 166, § 7; Code 1933, § 84-509; Ga. L. 1977, p. 232, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 43; Ga. L. 1986, p. 1534, § 1; Ga. L. 1988, p. 485, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 460, § 1; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1719, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 538, § 1.1; Ga. L. 2007, p. 494, § 1/SB 102; Ga. L. 2008, p. 324, § 43/SB 455.)
- Recovery for medical malpractice generally, § 51-1-27.
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1986, "subsection (b) of this Code section" was substituted for "43-9-16(b)" in subsection (c).
- For note on the chiropractor as an expert witness, see 15 Mercer L. Rev. 431 (1964).
- Since O.C.G.A. Ch. 9, T. 43 does not authorize chiropractors to prescribe or dispense vitamins, minerals, or nutritional substances, the prescription of such items for the treatment of a patient's ailments constitutes the unauthorized practice of medicine in this state. Foster v. Georgia Bd. of Chiropractic Exmrs., 257 Ga. 409, 359 S.E.2d 877 (1987) (decided prior to 1988 amendment, which added subsection (i)).
- O.C.G.A. § 43-9-16, as amended in 1993, applied to make an insurer responsible for paying the costs of devices prescribed by a chiropractor because, even though the amendment was not in effect at the time the insurer denied the claim, application thereof did not impair any vested rights of the insurer. Haezebrouck v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 216 Ga. App. 809, 455 S.E.2d 842 (1995).
- Diagnostic tests and procedures performed on a patient, consisting of diagnostic ultrasound spinal sonograph, dermatomal somatosensory evoked potential - upper extremity, upper dermatomal somatosensory evoked potential and motor/sensory nerve conduction studies with F-wave and H-reflex studies, were not within the scope of chiropractic practice as defined in O.C.G.A. § 43-9-1(2) and as set forth in O.C.G.A. § 43-9-16; the patient could not show these medical expenses accrued from a chiropractor's referral and were necessary for the treatment of the patient's injuries. Colvard v. Mosley, 270 Ga. App. 106, 605 S.E.2d 838 (2004).
- Because massage is not an authorized treatment modality under O.C.G.A. Ch. 9, T. 43, a contract for massage services was void and a chiropractor was not authorized to recover payment for rendering such services. Siegrist v. Iwuagwa, 229 Ga. App. 508, 494 S.E.2d 180 (1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 933, 119 S. Ct. 344, 142 L. Ed. 2d 284 (1998).
Cited in Georgia Ass'n of Osteopathic Physicians & Surgeons, Inc. v. Allen, 31 F. Supp. 206 (M.D. Ga. 1940); Caldwell v. Knight, 92 Ga. App. 747, 89 S.E.2d 900 (1955); Capes v. Bretz, 195 Ga. App. 467, 393 S.E.2d 702 (1990); College Park Cabs, Inc. v. Justus, 227 Ga. App. 66, 488 S.E.2d 88 (1997).
- Definition of "chiropractic" is not broad enough to bring chiropractic within definition of "practice of medicine." 1972 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U72-17.
- Using, recommending, and offering for sale hot and cold packs, and nonprescription over-the-counter structural supports commonly available through retail pharmacies is within the scope of practice of chiropractors. 1995 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 95-8.
Practitioners of chiropractic cannot give injections, withdraw blood, or pierce the skin for any diagnostic or operative procedure, or perform surgical procedures. 1979 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 79-45.
Practice of chiropractic does not permit administration of medications. 1979 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 79-45.
Chiropractor cannot use colonic irrigations, electrical treatments (except X-ray), and vitamins in treatment of patients. 1945-47 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 488 (decided prior to 1986 and 1988 amendments, which added subsections (b) and (i), respectively).
- Portion of former Code 1933, § 84-509 which purported to authorize signing of death certificates by chiropractors has been repealed by implication. 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-94; 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U71-60.
Referring patients for magnetic resonance imaging is not within the scope of practice of chiropractors in the State of Georgia. 1993 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 93-11.
- Constitutionality of statute prescribing conditions of practicing medicine or surgery as affected by question of discrimination against particular school or method, 54 A.L.R. 600.
Single or isolated transactions as falling within provisions of commercial or occupational licensing requirements, 93 A.L.R.2d 90.
Limitation on right of chiropractors and osteopathic physicians to participate in public medical welfare programs, 8 A.L.R.4th 1056.
Medical malpractice in connection with diagnosis, care, or treatment of diabetes, 43 A.L.R.5th 87.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-09-08
Citation: 359 S.E.2d 877, 257 Ga. 409, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 1037
Snippet: chiropractors is further delineated by OCGA § 43-9-16 . . . , which provides in pertinent part, as follows: