Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1980, p. 1723, § 6; Ga. L. 1996, p. 6, § 44.)
- As the developers knew when the developers bought the developers' property that the property was in a historic district and subject to the district's restrictions on development, the developers failed to show that the developers were denied due process or otherwise harmed by any of the claimed notice deficiencies in the county's designation of the historic district. Buckler v. DeKalb County Bd. of Comm'rs, 299 Ga. App. 465, 683 S.E.2d 22 (2009), cert. denied, No. S09C2027, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 3 (Ga. 2010).
- As the developers failed to show the developers were harmed by a county's alleged lack of strict compliance with the notice procedures of the Georgia Historic Preservation Act (HPA), O.C.G.A. § 44-10-20 et seq., and as the record established that the county substantially complied with the HPA in designating a historic district, the county's ordinance was valid. Buckler v. DeKalb County Bd. of Comm'rs, 299 Ga. App. 465, 683 S.E.2d 22 (2009), cert. denied, No. S09C2027, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 3 (Ga. 2010).
No results found for Georgia Code 44-10-26.