O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-14-190 (2019)

Disposition of proceeds

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The money arising from the sale of mortgaged property sold under the regulations prescribed in this part shall be paid to the person foreclosing the mortgage unless claimed by some other lien which by law has priority of payment over the mortgage; and, when there is any surplus after paying off the mortgage and other liens, the surplus shall be paid to the mortgagor or his agent.

History

Laws 1799, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 571; Code 1863, § 3873; Code 1868, § 3893; Code 1873, § 3969; Code 1882, § 3969; Civil Code 1895, § 2751; Civil Code 1910, § 3284; Code 1933, § 67-501.

Annotations

Law reviews. For survey article on real property law, see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 345 (2008).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Oldest lien has priority. - The mortgagee, having the oldest lien, was equitably entitled to have the proceeds in the hands of the sheriff applied thereto. Winter v. Garrard, 7 Ga. 183, 1849 Ga. LEXIS 120 (1849). See also Thomson v. McCordel, 27 Ga. 273, 1859 Ga. LEXIS 53 (1859). Payment of surplus. - Grantee of deeds to secure debt had to pay to grantors the surplus from a foreclosure sale of two properties to the grantee’s agent and a subsequent transfer of the properties to third parties for profit. Tower Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Smith, 204 Ga. App. 910, 423 S.E.2d 257, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 1276 (1992), cert. denied, No. S92C1381, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 821 (Ga. Oct. 2, 1992). Second mortgage referring to older mortgage. - A first mortgage was en-

titled to priority over a second which recited that there was an older mortgage on the same property, in a distribution of the proceeds of the mortgaged property, raised at a sale made by a receiver. Kiser & Co. v. Carrollton Dry Goods Co., 96 Ga. 760, 22 S.E. 303, 1895 Ga. LEXIS 184 (1895). Two mortgages executed on the same day are of equal date, and if both are recorded in time, are entitled to share pro rata in a fund not sufficient to satisfy them both. The law will not note fractions of a day except to prevent injustice, and in cases specially provided for by law. Russell v. C.D. Carr & Co., 38 Ga. 459, 1868 Ga. LEXIS 110 (1868). Where facts apparent on the faces of mortgages executed on same day show that it was the intention of the parties to

give the preference to one over the others, that lien so preferred will be enforced. Coleman & Co. v. Carhart, 74 Ga. 392, 1884 Ga. LEXIS 407 (1884). When there is a fund in court on which a judgment creditor can lay hands without trouble, expense or delay, a court of equity will not, at the instance of other creditors, holding junior mortgage liens on the fund, force the judgment creditor to proceed with a judgment against property in the hands of third persons, where the judgment creditor must encounter expense and delay in collecting the debt. Behn & Foster v. William H. Young & Co., 21 Ga. 207, 1857 Ga. LEXIS 38 (1857). Judgment obtained between mortgage and novation. - On a rule for distribution of money in the sheriff’s hands, judgments junior to mortgages to a party will prevail over a mortgage fi. fa. junior to the judgments and founded on a mortgage to that party, alleged to have been given in renewal of the former mortgages, but shown by the record to be a novation. Williams & Co. v. Donalson, 84 Ga. 593, 10 S.E. 1015, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 297 (1890). Judgment younger than mortgage but older than general judgment on same. - The owner of a mortgage on realty did not foreclose the mortgage, but obtained a general judgment on the debt secured by it, and the property embraced in the mortgage was sold by the sheriff. Another creditor, who had a judgment younger than the mortgage but older than the general judgment brought a rule against the sheriff for distribution of the funds realized from the sale of the property and the fund was properly awarded to the older of the two judgments. Thomasville Live Stock Co. v. Burney, 19 Ga. App. 703, 91 S.E. 1062, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 314 (1917). Creditor holding bonds as collateral. - At a time subsequent to the

deposit of bonds with a creditor as collateral, the creditor became the purchaser of the bonds under circumstances which rendered void the transaction culminating in a sale of the bonds to the creditor. If the sale was void, the holder of the bonds claiming to be the purchaser was relegated to the position of holder of the bonds as collateral security, and as such was the proper beneficiary in the proceedings to foreclose the trust deed to secure the payment of the bonds. Valdosta M. & W.R.R. v. Valdosta Bank & Trust Co., 144 Ga. 761, 87 S.E. 1083, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 121 (1916). Damages for wrongful foreclosure. - Measure of damages for wrongful foreclosure was the fair market value of the property foreclosed rather than the full bid price at a foreclosure sale to an agent of the grantee, in light of the grantee’s subsequent sale of the property to a good faith purchaser which prevented the grantors from redeeming their equity. Tower Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Smith, 204 Ga. App. 910, 423 S.E.2d 257, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 1276 (1992), cert. denied, No. S92C1381, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 821 (Ga. Oct. 2, 1992). In a suit brought by a purchaser seeking damages for wrongful foreclosure of certain real property after two foreclosure sales, the trial court erred in granting the second foreclosing bank attorney fees under O.C.G.A. § 9-15-14, based on frivolous litigation since the second bank had knowledge of the purchaser’s acquisition of the property via the first foreclosure, therefore, the purchaser’s suit did not lack substantial justification as to the second bank and the second bank’s failure to provide proper notice of the sale to the purchaser. Roylston v. Bank of Am., N.A., 290 Ga. App. 556, 660 S.E.2d 412, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 371 (2008).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 55 Am. Jur. 2d, Mortgages, § 778. Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms. 18 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Mortgages, § 232.

C.J.S. 59A C.J.S., Mortgages, §§ 960, 961. ALR. Garnishment of money in escrow, 10 A.L.R. 741. Taxes not ascribable to property sold as

a charge on proceeds of judicial or foreclosure sale, 58 A.L.R. 1220. Financial depression or lack of market as ground for enjoining sale under a mortgage or deed of trust to secure debt, 82 A.L.R. 976; 90 A.L.R. 1330; 94 A.L.R. 1352; 96 A.L.R. 853; 97 A.L.R. 1123; 104 A.L.R. 375. Protection of mortgagor or owner of mortgaged property, on foreclosure sale, by fixing upset or minimum price, requiring credit of specified amount on mortgage debt, or denying or limiting amount of deficiency judgment, 89 A.L.R. 1087; 90 A.L.R. 1330; 94 A.L.R. 1352; 96 A.L.R. 853; 97 A.L.R. 1123; 104 A.L.R. 375. Personal liability to mortgagor, as distinguished from mortgagee, of vendee of mortgaged premises who does not in term assume or agree to pay mortgage, 111 A.L.R. 1114. Rights in respect of surplus arising upon foreclosure sale of entire property covered by first mortgage, as between ju-

nior mortgagee of part of the property, and holders of liens upon other part subject to first mortgage, 119 A.L.R. 1109. Rights and remedies of mortgagee where mortgaged property is bid in on foreclosure as less than mortgage debt and it is redeemed by mortgagor or latter’s grantee, 128 A.L.R. 796. Right of true owner to recover proceeds of sale or lease of real property made by another in the belief that he was the owner of the property, 133 A.L.R. 1443. Constitutionality of statute which in effect limits judgment after crediting thereon fair market value of property purchased by him at execution sale, 144 A.L.R. 858. Rights in respect of proceeds of an award in eminent domain proceedings made after mortgage foreclosure sale, 170 A.L.R. 272. Recognition of action for damages for wrongful foreclosure - general views, 81 A.L.R.6th 161.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1990–2008 · leading case: Roylston v. Bank of Am., N.A., 660 S.E.2d 412 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008).
Roylston v. Bank of Am., N.A., 660 S.E.2d 412 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 4× “Roylston’s claim to the excess proceeds essentially sought a refund from the purchase price from his own winning bid, but he failed to present any legal authority that would tend to provide for such a claim.”
Tower Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Smith, 423 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 44-14-190 provides that money arising from the sale of mortgaged property is paid first to the person foreclosing or persons holding superior liens thereto and “when there is any surplus after paying off the mortgage and other liens, the surplus shall be paid to the…”
Little v. Fleet Fin., 481 S.E.2d 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 44-14-190. Appellant contends the fact that the agreement was made prior to the sale demonstrates the fraudulent nature of the agreement and subsequent sale.”
Dickens v. Calhoun First Nat'l Bank, 398 S.E.2d 814 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “They alleged that the bank failed to account for the surplus funds, retained the funds in violation of OCGA § 16-8-4, and refused to pay the surplus to subordinate creditors as required by OCGA § 44-14-190. They sought an accounting and judgment in the amount of the surplus plus…”
Caldwell v. Loeb, 742 F. Supp. 650 (N.D. Ga. 1990). · cites it 6× “He argues that he, as owner of the property at the time of the second foreclosure, has rights to the excess proceeds pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 44-14-190. *652 Childs is correct insofar as O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.