O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-14-262 (2019)

Grounds for immediate writ of possession

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The petitioner seeking an immediate writ of possession shall allege

under oath specific facts sufficient to show that it is within the power of the defendant to conceal, waste, encumber, convert, convey, or remove from the jurisdiction of the court the property which is the subject matter of the petition or that the petitioner’s postjudgment remedy would otherwise be inadequate.

History

Code 1933, § 67-710, enacted by Ga. L. 1975, p. 1213, § 3.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS As to who shall have possession pending trial of merits of foreclosure, the merits of foreclosure itself and particularly defenses and counterclaims thereto have no actual relevancy to this question. Ward v. Charles D. Hardwick Co., 156 Ga. App. 96, 274 S.E.2d 20, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2893 (1980).

It is error to rule on merits of foreclosure while ostensibly determining merits of writ of immediate possession. Ward v. Charles D. Hardwick Co., 156 Ga. App. 96, 274 S.E.2d 20, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2893 (1980).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 69 Am. Jur. 2d, Secured Transactions, § 121. C.J.S. 14 C.J.S., Chattel Mortgages, § 241. ALR. Chattel mortgagee’s failure to pursue proper course after taking possession as

affecting personal liability of mortgagor, 47 A.L.R. 582. Right of mortgagee lawfully in possession, or one entitled to his rights, to retain possession until debt is paid, although debt or right to foreclose is barred by limitation, 115 A.L.R. 339.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–2017 · leading case: Flateau v. Reinhardt, Whitley & Wilmot, 469 S.E.2d 222 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).
Flateau v. Reinhardt, Whitley & Wilmot, 469 S.E.2d 222 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “The facts stated in the affidavit, in conjunction with the facts alleged in the petition, were sufficient to show that it was within the power of the named defendant to “conceal, waste, encumber, convert, convey, or remove from the jurisdiction of the court the property which…”
Triple C Flatbed Holdings, LLC v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 44-14-262. Triple C was served on May 17, 2016 with the verified petition and order granting the writ of immediate possession.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.