O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-2-84 (2019)

Review by Court of Appeals

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All judgments and decrees of the superior court or the judge thereof which are rendered under this article shall be subject to review by the Court of Appeals.

History

(Ga. L. 1917, p. 108, § 82; Code 1933, § 60-224; Ga. L. 2016, p. 883, § 3-9/HB 927.)

Annotations

The 2016 amendment, effective January 1, 2017, at the end of this Code section, substituted "Court of Appeals" for "Supreme Court". See Editor's notes for applicability.

Editor's notes. - Ga. L. 2016, p. 883, § 1-1/HB 927, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Appellate Jurisdiction Reform Act of 2016.'"

Ga. L. 2016, p. 883, § 6-1/HB 927, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that: "Part III of this Act shall become effective on January 1, 2017, and shall apply to cases in which a notice of appeal or application to appeal is filed on or after such date."

Law reviews. - For article on the 2016 amendment of this Code section, see 33 Georgia St. U. L. Rev. 205 (2016).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 66 Am. Jur. 2d, Registration of Land Titles, § 23.

C.J.S. - 76 C.J.S., Registration of Land Titles, § 17.

- - - - - - - - - -

PART 3 EXAMINERS

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR. - Constitutionality of provisions of Torrens Law as to prima facie effect of the examiner's reports, 19 A.L.R. 62.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: AA OK, LTD. v. City of Atlanta, 632 S.E.2d 633 (Ga. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
AA OK, LTD. v. City of Atlanta, 632 S.E.2d 633 (Ga. 2006). · cites it 2× “(hereinafter referred to as Appellant) brings this appeal pursuant to OCGA § 44-2-84. 1. Appellant urges that the examiner failed to file a transcript of the hearing and that, consequently, the trial court erred in adopting the examiner’s report without first reviewing that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.