O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 44-2-84 (2019)
Review by Supreme Court
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
All judgments and decrees of the superior court or the judge thereof which are rendered under this article shall be subject to review by the Supreme Court.
History
(Ga. L. 1917, p. 108, § 82; Code 1933, § 60-224.)
Annotations
RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 66 Am. Jur. 2d, Registration of Land Titles, § 23.
C.J.S. - 76 C.J.S., Registration of Land Titles, § 17.
Part 3 Examiners RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Constitutionality of provisions of Torrens Law as to prima facie effect of the examiner’s reports, 19 ALR 62.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2006–2006 · leading case: AA OK, LTD. v. City of Atlanta, 632 S.E.2d 633 (Ga. 2006).
AA OK, LTD. v. City of Atlanta, 632 S.E.2d 633 (Ga. 2006). “(hereinafter referred to as Appellant) brings this appeal pursuant to OCGA § 44-2-84. 1. Appellant urges that the examiner failed to file a transcript of the hearing and that, consequently, the trial court erred in adopting the examiner’s report without first reviewing that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.