Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Georgia Property Owners' Association Act."
(Code 1981, §44-3-220, enacted by Ga. L. 1994, p. 1879, § 1.)
- Trial court properly found that an easement did not authorize general access to a lake for all members of the homeowners' association but a remand was required as genuine issues existed as to what was reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of the easement and whether a walkway and bridge caused interference and damage to the easement holders. Crabapple Lake Parc Cmty. Ass'n v. Circeo, 325 Ga. App. 101, 751 S.E.2d 866 (2013).
- In a suit challenging a homeowners association's declaration amendment allowing the association to enter into an agreement with a nearby private swim and tennis club, the trial court erred by not granting the association's summary judgment because even without the amendment, the association was authorized, for the common benefit of all homeowners, to accept an easement granting the homeowners access to recreational facilities, and to assess the homeowners their pro rata share of the ongoing cost of the easement. Amberfield Homeowners Ass'n v. Young, 346 Ga. App. 29, 813 S.E.2d 618 (2018).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1996-03-04
Citation: 467 S.E.2d 330, 266 Ga. 322, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 876, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 99
Snippet: Georgia Property Owners' Association Act, OCGA § 44-3-220 et seq., was a prerequisite for future collection