O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 44-5-32 (2019)

Requisites of instruments other than deeds

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Every bond for title, bond to reconvey realty, contract to sell or to convey realty or any interest therein and every transfer or assignment of any of such instruments shall, except as between the parties thereto, be executed with

the same formality as is required for the execution of deeds conveying realty.

History

(Ga. L. 1921, p. 157, § 1; Code 1933, § 29-114.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For comment on Chase v. Endsley, 165 Ga. 292, 140 S.E. 876 (1927), see 1 Ga. L. Rev. No. 3, p. 49 (1927). JUDICIAL DECISIONS Grantor in possession under bond can lease timber rights when grantee’s security not impaired. - Grantor, who was in possession of timberland under a bond for title, could lease the timber rights, and, so long as the grantor remained in possession, extend

the term of the lease so long as the security of the grantee was not impaired. Chisem v. Kirby-Evans Material Co., 209 Ga. 342, 72 S.E.2d 305 (1952). Cited in Mangum v. Jones, 205 Ga. 661, 54 S.E.2d 603 (1949).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 23 Am. Jur. 2d, Deeds, §§ 1, 4.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1995–1995 · leading case: Pawn World, Inc. v. Est. of Sam Farkas, Inc., 461 S.E.2d 295 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995).
Pawn World, Inc. v. Est. of Sam Farkas, Inc., 461 S.E.2d 295 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 44-5-32. In the case sub judice, the record is devoid of any writing purporting to assign the interest of AAA Distributors, the purchaser named in the writing sued on, to Pawn World, the only named plaintiff.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.