
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448As used in this subpart, the term:
(Code 1981, §44-6-180, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 97, § 2/HB 744.)
- For article, "A Primer on Heirs Property and Georgia's New Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act: Protecting Owners of Heirs Property," see 19 G. St. B.J. 16 (Oct. 2013).
- Denial of the appellant's motion for a new trial was reversed because in light of the mandatory language in the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act (UPHPA), specifically O.C.G.A. § 44-6-181(b), the trial court erred in not making an initial determination, prior to ordering the parties to mediation, whether the property was heirs property and, if so, it was required to partition the property pursuant to the UPHPA unless all of the cotenants, not just all of the non-defaulting cotenants, otherwise agreed. Faison v. Faison, 344 Ga. App. 600, 811 S.E.2d 431 (2018).
Database error: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 8 attempt to write a readonly database
This Georgia Code resource is curated by a Florida and Georgia attorney, a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.