Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Laws 1828, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 545; Ga. L. 1853-54, p. 70, § 1; Code 1863, § 2281; Code 1868, § 2274; Code 1873, § 2300; Code 1882, § 2300; Civil Code 1895, § 3142; Civil Code 1910, § 3722; Code 1933, § 85-1002; Ga. L. 1976, p. 1388, § 10; Ga. L. 1976, p. 1438, § 2; Ga. L. 1980, p. 753, § 2; Ga. L. 1984, p. 1335, § 2; Ga. L. 1985, p. 149, § 44; Ga. L. 2015, p. 827, § 1/HB 99.)
The 2015 amendment, effective July 1, 2015, rewrote this Code section.
- Presumption of existence of joint tenancy with right of survivorship when share certificates or other securities are issued or transferred to two or more persons in joint tenancy on books or records of corporation, § 14-5-8.
- For article arguing for reestablishment of the true joint tenancy with survivorship in Georgia prior to the 1976 amendment to this Code section, see 3 Ga. St. B.J. 29 (1966). For article discussing joint tenancy arrangements as a means of avoiding probate, see 6 Ga. L. Rev. 74 (1971). For article discussing joint ownership of assets and severance of such ownership, see 14 Ga. St. B.J. 14 (1977). For article discussing several aspects of joint tenancy with right of survivorship, see 16 Ga. St. B.J. 54 (1979). For article, "Joint Bank Accounts: A Different Form of Joint Tenancy," see 17 Ga. St. B.J. 184 (1981). For annual survey article on real property law, see 50 Mercer L. Rev. 307 (1998). For survey article on real property law, see 60 Mercer L. Rev. 345 (2008). For annual survey on real property, see 64 Mercer L. Rev. 255 (2012). For note discussing the treatment of joint bank accounts in Georgia, with regard to survivorship and testamentary effect, prior to the enactment of the Financial Institutions Code of Georgia, see 7 Ga. St. B.J. 370 (1971). For comment on Eppes v. Locklin, 222 Ga. 86, 149 S.E.2d 148 (1966), see 1 Ga. L. Rev. 331 (1967).
- Common law doctrine of survivorship among joint tenants was abolished by the Constitution of 1777. Lowe v. Brooks, 23 Ga. 325 (1857); Carswell v. Schley, 56 Ga. 101 (1876). See also Bryan v. Averett, 21 Ga. 401, 68 Am. Dec. 464 (1857); Harrison v. Harrison, 105 Ga. 517, 31 S.E. 455, 70 Am. St. R. 60 (1898); Equitable Loan & Sec. Co. v. Waring, 117 Ga. 599, 44 S.E. 320, 97 Am. St. R. 177, 62 L.R.A. 93 (1903).
- When the legislature in 1828 interfered with the doctrine of the common law as to survivorship, the language used by the legislature shows that the legislature did so, not as believing the doctrine to be in force, but out of abundant caution lest it might be in force. Lowe v. Brooks, 23 Ga. 325 (1857).
- Act of 1828 confined itself to estates in "lands." In 1854, the legislature extended the Act "to personal estate held in joint tenancy." Lowe v. Brooks, 23 Ga. 325 (1857).
- Although a joint tenancy with right of survivorship was abolished by statute, the Georgia courts continued to recognize such joint estates if expressly created. In 1976, the General Assembly superseded former Code 1933, § 85-1002 with Ga. L. 1976, p. 1388 (see O.C.G.A. § 44-6-190), which recognizes this fact. Barnes v. Mance, 246 Ga. 314, 271 S.E.2d 359 (1980).
- Prior to 1976, although joint tenancy as it existed at common law was abolished, one could clearly intend by the language in one's will to create a right of survivorship, which could not be destroyed by severance. The transferees would hold vested life estates with cross contingent remainders. Williams v. Studstill, 251 Ga. 466, 306 S.E.2d 633 (1983).
Joint survivorship may be created by deed to oneself and another. Barnes v. Mance, 246 Ga. 314, 271 S.E.2d 359 (1980).
Deed entitled "Warranty Deed with right of survivorship" expressly created such an estate in father and his son, and therefore the land became the son's at father's death, and was not part of father's estate. Barnes v. Mance, 246 Ga. 314, 271 S.E.2d 359 (1980).
- When created by contract, the right of survivorship will be enforced. Commercial Banking Co. v. Spurlock, 238 Ga. 123, 231 S.E.2d 748 (1977).
- Joint tenancies in bank and stock investment accounts and in real property did not terminate as a matter of law when one of the joint tenants was declared incapacitated and a guardian was appointed for that tenant's person and property. A guardian, unlike a trustee, has no beneficial title in the ward's estate, but is merely a custodian or manager. Moore v. Self, 222 Ga. App. 71, 473 S.E.2d 507 (1996).
- A will transfers property interests only when the will has been probated after the testator's death, so a will cannot qualify as an instrument making a lifetime transfer capable of severing a joint tenancy for purposes of O.C.G.A. § 44-6-190(a). Harbin v. Harbin, 261 Ga. App. 244, 582 S.E.2d 131 (2003).
Defendant widow was properly granted summary judgment on plaintiff son's claim to reform certain deeds to two tracts of real property when the son wanted the deeds to reflect the intention of the decedent that the son receive part of the property pursuant to an attempted devise in the decedent's will. The deeds created a joint tenancy with a right of survivorship in the decedent and the widow in compliance with O.C.G.A. § 44-6-190(a), and, since the will did not qualify as a lifetime transfer of the property so as to sever the joint tenancy and there was no proof of mutual mistake or unilateral mistake combined with fraud or inequitable conduct to justify reforming the deed in equity, the widow became the sole owner of the property when the decedent died, and the property never became part of the decedent's estate upon the decedent's death; the widow's consent to probate the will did not constitute an admission that the devise was valid. Harbin v. Harbin, 261 Ga. App. 244, 582 S.E.2d 131 (2003).
- Execution of a deed to secure debt by a joint tenant in real property is not such a transfer of all or a part of the grantor's interest in the property as would sever the joint tenancy with right of survivorship. Biggers v. Crook, 283 Ga. 50, 656 S.E.2d 835 (2008).
Deed to secure debt executed by a joint tenant with right of survivorship under O.C.G.A. § 44-6-190 did not sever the joint tenancy. Thus, when a decedent executed a deed to secure debt on property the decedent held jointly with a surviving sibling, and the security agreement encumbered the decedent's interest only, the decedent's death made the sibling the sole owner of the property, and the deed to secure debt was void. Biggers v. Crook, 283 Ga. 50, 656 S.E.2d 835 (2008).
- Superior court erred in granting the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's petition for an equitable partition of real property and an accounting because the property was not held by the parties as joint tenants with the right of survivorship at the time of the petition as the plaintiff's 2007 quitclaim deed to another individual was a transfer in the plaintiff's lifetime of all of the plaintiff's interest in the property, although the plaintiff quickly received the property back again from the other individual, because, when the other individual received a grant of the plaintiff's interest in the property by virtue of the quitclaim deed, it was the other individual's property to do with as the other individual wished. Reed v. McConathy, 299 Ga. 471, 788 S.E.2d 769 (2016).
- When the appellant sought a petition for equitable partition of the unmarried parties' property in which the parties were joint tenants with the right of survivorship, the trial judge properly found that statutory partition was available only to tenants in common, and was not available to the appellant; and that equitable partition was also unavailable because the appellant could seek a partition of the subject property only after the joint tenancy was severed as the parties were not married parties who were seeking the equitable division of marital property in a divorce proceeding. Vargo v. Adams, 302 Ga. 637, 805 S.E.2d 817 (2017).
- Deed conveyed a life estate to a widow and a decedent as tenants in common in compliance with O.C.G.A. § 44-6-190, but the deed conveyed the estate in remainder to only one person, either the widow or the decedent, whoever survived the other, and because the deed did not convey that interest in the property to two or more persons, § 44-6-190 did not apply. Greene v. Greene, 311 Ga. App. 132, 714 S.E.2d 650 (2011).
Cited in Lee v. State, 62 Ga. App. 556, 8 S.E.2d 706 (1940); Lewis v. Patterson, 191 Ga. 348, 12 S.E.2d 593 (1940); Lee v. State, 64 Ga. App. 290, 13 S.E.2d 79 (1941), commented on in 1 Ga. L. Rev. 331 (1967); Eppes v. Locklin, 222 Ga. 86, 149 S.E.2d 148 (1966); Sams v. McDonald, 117 Ga. App. 336, 160 S.E.2d 594 (1968); Brown v. Five Points Parking Ctr., 121 Ga. App. 819, 175 S.E.2d 901 (1970); Savannah Bank & Trust Co. v. Keane, 126 Ga. App. 53, 189 S.E.2d 702 (1972); Tri-City Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Evans, 132 Ga. App. 735, 209 S.E.2d 20 (1974); Eppes v. Wood, 243 Ga. 835, 257 S.E.2d 259 (1979); State v. Jackson, 197 Ga. App. 619, 399 S.E.2d 88 (1990); Wallace v. Meehan, 162 Bankr. 367 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1993); Mathis v. Hammond, 268 Ga. 158, 486 S.E.2d 356 (1997).
- 20 Am. Jur. 2d, Cotenancy and Joint Ownership, § 1 et seq.
- 26A C.J.S., Deeds, §§ 262, 267, 277. 41 C.J.S., Husband and Wife, §§ 39, 40. 86 C.J.S., Tenancy in Common, § 6 et seq.
- Effect on joint estate, community estate, or estate by entireties, of death of both tenants in same disaster, 18 A.L.R. 105.
Character of interests of husband and wife in purchase-money mortgage on sale of estate by entireties, 30 A.L.R. 905.
Divorce as affecting estate by entireties, 52 A.L.R. 890; 59 A.L.R. 718.
Right of survivorship in respect of bank deposit as affected by statutes abolishing joint tenancy and survivorship, 85 A.L.R. 282.
Rights and remedies of judgment creditor or of purchaser under execution, in respect of estate in real property held in joint tenancy, 111 A.L.R. 171.
Lease to two or more as creating a tenancy in common or a joint tenancy, 113 A.L.R. 573.
Right of creditors of one spouse, either before or after death of other spouse, to attack conveyance or encumbrance of estate by entireties by both spouses as in fraud of creditors, 121 A.L.R. 1028.
Statutory lien on interest of joint tenant as severing joint tenancy, 134 A.L.R. 957.
Statute relating to joint tenancy in personal property as applicable to choses in action, 144 A.L.R. 1465.
Mental incompetency of one spouse as affecting transfer or encumbrance of community property, homestead property, or estate by the entireties, 155 A.L.R. 306.
Right of survivor of parties to bank account in their joint names as affected by provision excluding his right of withdrawal during the lifetime of the other party, 155 A.L.R. 1084.
Use of word "joint" or "jointly" in provision of deed other than the granting or habendum clause as indicating intent to create a joint tenancy rather than one in common between the grantees, 157 A.L.R. 566.
Interest of spouse in estate by entireties as subject to satisfaction of his or her individual debt, 166 A.L.R. 969; 75 A.L.R.2d 1172.
Gift over to surviving members of a group of share of deceased member as creating absolute interest in last survivor, 166 A.L.R. 1277.
Creation of right of survivorship by instrument ineffective to create estate by entireties or joint tenancy, 1 A.L.R.2d 247.
Survivor's rights to contents of safe-deposit box leased or used jointly with another, 14 A.L.R.2d 948.
Transmutation of community funds or property into property held by spouses in joint tenancy, 30 A.L.R.2d 1241.
Character of tenancy created by owner's conveyance to himself and another, or to another alone, of an undivided interest, 44 A.L.R.2d 595.
What constitutes a devise or bequest in joint tenancy notwithstanding statute raising a presumption against joint tenancy, 46 A.L.R.2d 523.
Estates by entirety in personal property, 64 A.L.R.2d 8; 22 A.L.R.4th 459.
What acts by one or more of joint tenants will sever or terminate the tenancy, 64 A.L.R.2d 918; 39 A.L.R.4th 1068.
Construction of devise to persons as joint tenants and expressly to the survivor of them, or to them "with the right of survivorship,", 69 A.L.R.2d 1058.
Estate by entireties as affected by statute declaring nature of tenancy under grant or devise to two or more persons, 32 A.L.R.3d 570.
Proceeds or derivatives of real property held by entirety as themselves held by entirety, 22 A.L.R.4th 459.
Contract of sale or granting of option to purchase, to third party, by both or all of joint tenants or tenants by entirety as severing or terminating tenancy, 39 A.L.R.4th 1068.
Judgment lien or levy of execution on one joint tenant's share or interest as severing joint tenancy, 51 A.L.R.4th 906.
Total Results: 10
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-06-30
Snippet: tenants with right of survivorship. See OCGA § 44- 6-190; see also Biggers v. Crook, 283 Ga. 50, 52-53
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-02-19
Citation: 810 S.E.2d 480
Snippet: and, in what would later be codified as OCGA § 44-6-190, provided a word-by-word method of creating a
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-10-02
Citation: 302 Ga. 637, 805 S.E.2d 817
Snippet: erroneous. Id. at 473. Pursuant to what is now OCGA § 44-6-190 (a) (3), a transfer during the life of one of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-07-08
Citation: 299 Ga. 471, 788 S.E.2d 769, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 471
Snippet: parties below, met the requirements of then-OCGA § 44-6-190, 1 and resulted in Reed and McConathy
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-01
Snippet: tenants with right of survivorship. See OCGA § 44-6-190.4 The Property was not 3 In that
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-01
Citation: 297 Ga. 274, 773 S.E.2d 274, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 371
Snippet: tenants with right of survivorship. See OCGA § 44-6-190. 4 The Property was not refinanced
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-01-28
Citation: 656 S.E.2d 835, 283 Ga. 50, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 217, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 32
Snippet: joint tenancy with right of survivorship. OCGA § 44-6-190[1] was enacted in 1976 to permit the express creation
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-06-30
Citation: 486 S.E.2d 356, 268 Ga. 158, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 2433, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 352
Snippet: indispensable party. *358 2. Since the enactment of OCGA § 44-6-190 in 1976, Georgia has recognized statutorily the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-09-26
Citation: 396 S.E.2d 208, 260 Ga. 400
Snippet: Weltner, J., not participating. NOTES [1] OCGA § 44-6-190; Pindar, Georgia Real Estate Law, § 19-13-1 (3rd
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1983-09-07
Citation: 306 S.E.2d 633, 251 Ga. 466
Snippet: L. 1976, p. 1388; Ga. L. 1980, p. 753; OCGA § 44-6-190 (Code Ann. § 85-1002).