Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448The destruction of a tenement by fire or the loss of possession by any casualty not caused by the landlord or from a defect of his title shall not abate the rent contracted to be paid.
(Orig. Code 1863, § 2274; Code 1868, § 2267; Code 1873, § 2293; Code 1882, § 2293; Civil Code 1895, § 3135; Civil Code 1910, § 3711; Code 1933, § 61-113.)
- Tenant of a rented house is liable for the stipulated rent to the end of the tenant's term although the house, before the expiration of such term, be destroyed by fire, unless the landlord does some act which in law amounts to an eviction of the tenant. Pope v. Gerrard, 39 Ga. 471 (1869); Fleming & Bowles v. King, 100 Ga. 449, 28 S.E. 239 (1897).
Reason for rule is that the loss of the rent must fall somewhere, and there is no more equity that the landlord should bear it than the tenant, when the tenant has expressly agreed to pay the rent, and when the landlord must bear the loss of the property destroyed. Equity considers the calamity mutual and will not interfere to relieve against the express contract of the tenant. White v. Molyneux, 2 Ga. 124 (1847).
- Statute is a codification of a common-law principle. Mayer & Crine v. Morehead, 106 Ga. 434, 32 S.E. 349 (1899) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-7-15).
- Casualty has been defined as "unforeseen circumstances not to be guarded against by human agency, and in which man takes no part," as "an unforeseen accident; a misfortune," as an "event not to be foreseen or guarded against." Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Rippey Motor Co., 41 Ga. App. 784, 154 S.E. 823 (1930).
Violent windstorm of unusual nature, such as might not reasonably be foreseen or guarded against, resulting in damage, should be deemed a casualty. Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Rippey Motor Co., 41 Ga. App. 784, 154 S.E. 823 (1930).
- Entering on premises to clean brick is not eviction when tenant did not object, nor was building wall around premises and pulling down remains of building under order of city. Fleming & Bowles v. King, 100 Ga. 449, 28 S.E. 239 (1897).
To constitute an eviction which will operate as a suspension of rent, there must be either an actual expulsion of the tenant, or some act of a grave and permanent character done by the landlord with the intention of depriving the tenant of the enjoyment of the demised premises. The granting of an order restraining the tenant from removing the tenant's goods beyond the state, and the appointment of a receiver who took possession for several weeks did not amount to an eviction of the tenant. Potts-Thompson Liquor Co. v. Capital City Tobacco Co., 137 Ga. 648, 74 S.E. 279 (1912).
Grant of summary judgment to an apartment management company on its counterclaim for unpaid rent was affirmed as its alleged failure to provide security or to properly repair the tenant's lock did not constitute acts of a grave and permanent character committed with the intention of depriving the tenant of the use of their apartment without unreasonable interruption nor did they render the apartment uninhabitable. George v. Hercules Real Estate Services, Inc., 339 Ga. App. 843, 795 S.E.2d 81 (2016).
- Implied covenant in a lease contract for the quiet enjoyment of the premises by the tenant obligates the landlord to protect the tenant only against the landlord's own acts, and not against the acts of strangers which disturb the tenant in the tenant's quiet enjoyment and possession of the rented premises. Adair v. Allen, 18 Ga. App. 636, 89 S.E. 1099 (1916); Parker v. Munn Sign & Adv. Co., 29 Ga. App. 420, 115 S.E. 926 (1923), overruled on other grounds by George v. Hercules Real Estate Servs., 795 S.E.2d 81 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).
- If the tenant would guard against loss by fire and tempest, the tenant must introduce into the tenant's lease an exception to that effect. Lennard v. Boynton, 11 Ga. 109 (1852); Pope v. Gerrard, 39 Ga. 471 (1869). See also, Guthman v. Castleberry, 49 Ga. 272 (1873); Fleming & Bowles v. King, 100 Ga. 449, 28 S.E. 239 (1897).
- When there is nothing to indicate an intention to limit the possession to buildings, and city premises are described by street numbers, the lessee takes an interest in the yard, garden, subjacent land, and appurtenances, and retains the right to the possession of such land after the buildings thereon have been destroyed, being in turn bound to pay rent for the balance of the term. P.H. Snook & Austin Furn. Co. v. Steiner & Emery, 117 Ga. 363, 43 S.E. 775 (1903).
When the lease is only of a storeroom, the destruction of the building containing the apartment terminates the tenant's interest in the land, and the tenant has no right to damages on account of the landlord's refusal to permit the tenant to occupy a similar apartment in a new structure erected on the same land. Gavan v. Norcross, 117 Ga. 356, 43 S.E. 771 (1903).
- If a storm completely destroys a dwelling, the landlord is not required to replace the dwelling, nor does the rent abate. Mayer & Crine v. Morehead, 106 Ga. 434, 32 S.E. 349 (1899).
- Statute imposes upon the tenant no obligation to replace a building or any portion thereof destroyed by fire, unless the tenant has contracted to do so. Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Rippey Motor Co., 41 Ga. App. 784, 154 S.E. 823 (1930) (see O.C.G.A. § 44-7-15).
- Lessee cannot set off against the rent the value of a building which the lessee voluntarily erected on the rented premises to take the place of one destroyed by fire. Hicks & Son v. Mozley & Co., 12 Ga. App. 661, 78 S.E. 133 (1913).
- While it is true that the destruction of a tenement by fire, or the loss thereof by a casualty not caused by the landlord, will not release the tenant from a rent contract already in existence, still, if the landlord makes an admission in judicio that the landlord has parted with full title to the property, thus rendering the landlord unable to specifically perform the contract as to such property, equity will not decree specific performance as to the adverse party. Ledbetter v. Goodroe, 179 Ga. 69, 175 S.E. 250 (1934).
- Lessee of hotel with barroom can have no reduction of rent on account of law prohibiting sale of liquors, without express stipulation. Lawrence v. White, 131 Ga. 840, 63 S.E. 631, 12 L.R.A. (n.s.) 966, 15 Am. Ann. Cas. 1097 (1909).
Cited in Kanes v. Koutras, 203 Ga. 570, 47 S.E.2d 558 (1948); Sewell v. Royal, 147 Ga. App. 88, 248 S.E.2d 165 (1978).
- 49 Am. Jur. 2d, Landlord and Tenant, §§ 456, 475.
- 52A C.J.S., Landlord and Tenant, § 1010.
- What is unavoidable or inevitable casualty or accident within provision of lease, 20 A.L.R. 1101; 24 A.L.R. 1461.
Acts of insurance company or public authorities to protect property after fire as constructive eviction of tenant, 29 A.L.R. 1361.
Landlord's liability for damage to tenant's property by fire, 66 A.L.R. 1393.
Condition of premises within contemplation of provision of lease or statute for cessation of rent or termination of lease in event of destruction of or damage to property as result of fire, 118 A.L.R. 106; 61 A.L.R.2d 1445.
Validity, construction, and application of statute or ordinance which precludes recovery of rent in case of occupancy of building which does not conform to building and health regulations, or where certificate of conformity has not been issued, 144 A.L.R. 259.
Condemnation of premises or part thereof as affecting rights of landlord and tenant inter se, 163 A.L.R. 679.
Duty of lessee to remove his equipment, machinery, debris, or other property from leased premises after a fire or casualty, 46 A.L.R.2d 839.
Condition of premises within contemplation of provision of lease or statute for cessation of rent or termination of lease in event of destruction of or damage to property as result of fire, calamity, the elements, act of God, or the like, 61 A.L.R.2d 1445.
Validity, construction, and effect of provision of lease exempting landlord or tenant from liability on account of fire, 15 A.L.R.3d 786.
Landlord's liability for damage to tenant's property caused by water, 35 A.L.R.3d 143.
Modern status of rule as to tenant's rent liability after injury to or destruction of demised premises, 99 A.L.R.3d 738.
No results found for Georgia Code 44-7-15.