Section deals with owners, not state.

- O.C.G.A. § 44-8-3 was not intended to deprive the state of its power of eminent domain, but rather it was definitive of the rights of one riparian owner as against the other. Nolan v. Central Ga. Power Co., 134 Ga. 201, 67 S.E. 656 (1910); Whitney v. Central Ga. Power Co., 134 Ga. 213, 67 S.E. 197, 19 Ann. Cas. 982 (1910).

O.C.G.A. § 44-8-3 does not apply to tidal waters. West v. Baumgartner, 124 Ga. App. 318, 184 S.E.2d 213 (1971), rev'd on other grounds, 228 Ga. 671, 187 S.E.2d 665 (1972).

Landowner of nontidal stream bed has exclusive fishing rights.

- Where tidal waters are not involved, the ownership of the fee in the bed of the stream generally carries with it the exclusive right of fishery in the stream. West v. Baumgartner, 124 Ga. App. 318, 184 S.E.2d 213 (1971), rev'd on other grounds, 228 Ga. 671, 187 S.E.2d 665 (1972).

By the common law the right to take fish belongs essentially to the right of soil in streams where the tide does not ebb and flow. Bosworth v. Nelson, 170 Ga. 279, 152 S.E. 575 (1930).

With extent of rights dependent on whether one or both shores owned.

- If the riparian owner owns both sides of the stream, no one but the owner may come within the limits of land and take fish. The same right applies so far as the owner's land extends to the thread of the stream, where the owner upon one side only. Within these limits, by common law, the owner's rights of fishery are sole and exclusive. Bosworth v. Nelson, 170 Ga. 279, 152 S.E. 575 (1930).

Summary judgment appropriate.

- Because there was no admissible evidence demonstrating the navigability of a stream, the trial court correctly granted summary judgment on that question. Givens v. Ichauway, Inc., 268 Ga. 710, 493 S.E.2d 148 (1997).

Cited in Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Sikes, 4 Ga. App. 7, 60 S.E. 868 (1908); Groover v. Hightower, 59 Ga. App. 491, 1 S.E.2d 446 (1939); Payne v. Whiting, 140 Ga. App. 390, 231 S.E.2d 796 (1976).

Person owns rights to nonnavigable stream's center if owns one bank.

- The Supreme Court of Georgia has held that "the owner of land adjoining a nonnavigable stream is the owner of the soil to the center of the thread of the stream, and of the fishing rights to the center of the thread on his side of the stream; if one proprietor owns the land on both sides of the stream, he has the exclusive right of fishing therein." 1960-61 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 235.

Consent of riparian owner must be obtained before removing floating logs from nonnavigable streams. 1958-59 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 220.

The owner of land adjacent to a navigable stream owns to the low-water mark of that stream, and there is no question but that the owner of the land may prevent fishing from upon lands and could well have exclusive fishing rights to the low-water mark thereof. 1962 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 249.

Landowner around lake can prohibit fishing up to navigable stream's low-water mark.

- Where the river is navigable at the point where the lake comes into the stream, and the same person owns the land on both sides of the lake and the land on both sides of the mouth of the lake, the owner would have the exclusive fishing rights to the low-water mark of navigable stream; assuming the conditions above, the lake and the lands could be posted by the owner notwithstanding the fact that the lake and lands might be posted by operation of law. 1962 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 249.

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 78 Am. Jur. 2d, Waters, §§ 10, 229-232, 274-276, 382, 383.

C.J.S.

- T93 C.J.S., Waters, §§ 39, 40.

ALR.

- Right of owner of upland to make a use, not connected with navigation, of the shore between high and low water mark, which excludes the general public, 10 A.L.R. 1053; 107 A.L.R. 1347.

Specific description with reference to water, in conveyance of riparian land, as marking the extent of grantee's ownership of the submerged land and the shore, 74 A.L.R. 597.

Apportionment and division of area of river as between riparian tracts fronting on same bank, in absence of agreement or specification, 65 A.L.R.2d 143.