O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 45-15-12 (2019)

Attorney General authorized to prosecute civil recovery actions for violations while dealing with state or officials, employees, or entities thereof

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Attorney General, as the head of the Department of Law and the chief legal officer of the state, is authorized to file and prosecute civil recovery actions in the name of the state against any person, firm, or corporation which violates any statute while dealing with the state or any official, employee, department, agency, board, bureau, commission, institution, or authority thereof, which violation results in loss, damage, or injury to the state or to any of its departments, adjuncts, or taxpayers.

History

(Ga. L. 1943, p. 284, § 8.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS An individual cannot sue in own name for the use and benefit of the

state. Alexander v. Citizens & S. Nat’l Bank, 212 Ga. 295, 92 S.E.2d 16 (1956).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 7 Am. Jur. 2d, Attorney General, § 21 et seq. C.J.S. - 7A C.J.S., Attorney General, §§ 43-45.

ALR. - Right or duty of Attorney General to intervene in civil suits, 163 ALR 1346.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2023 · leading case: Perdue v. Baker, 586 S.E.2d 606 (Ga. 2003).
Perdue v. Baker, 586 S.E.2d 606 (Ga. 2003). · cites it 4× “[48] OCGA § 45-15-12. [49] OCGA § 45-15-13. [50] OCGA § 45-15-7.”
Gwinnett Cnty. v. Netflix, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to OCGA § 45-15-12, the Attorney General “is authorized to file and prosecute civil recovery actions in the name of the state against any person, firm, or corporation which violates any statute while dealing with the state[.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.