O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 45-9-22 (2019)

Payment of claims or judgment against members of municipal, county, or other public body

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any municipality, county, or other public body may, in its discretion, adopt a policy establishing the terms and conditions under which it may pay part or all of any claim or civil judgment rendered against any person whose defense such municipality, county, or other public body is authorized to undertake under Code Section 45-9-21. Any such disbursement shall be deemed to be for public purposes and may be paid from state, federal, or local funds. No attempt shall be made at the trial of any action brought against a person covered under this Code section to suggest the fact that the municipality, county, or public body will be responsible for any judgment therein. (b) The failure to adopt a policy as provided in this Code section prior to making any payments authorized by this Code section shall not invalidate any such payments if the governing authority of the municipality, county, or public body shall, within a reasonable time after the fact of such failure has been brought to its attention, adopt a policy as provided in this Code section.

History

(Ga. L. 1978, p. 1380, § 1.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Legislative intent. - It is the intent of the Code sections comprising Article 2, O.C.G.A. § 45-9-20 et seq., with certain exceptions, to authorize a county, municipality, or other public body to purchase insurance or adopt policies to indemnify governmental employees or officers against personal liability for damages

arising out of the performance of their duties, and to defend actions in which such damages are sought, in those instances in which a defense of sovereign or official immunity is unavailable. Hendon v. DeKalb County, 203 Ga. App. 750, 417 S.E.2d 705, cert. denied, 203 Ga. App. 906, 417 S.E.2d 705 (1992).

PUBLIC OFFICERS & EMPLOYEES

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Liability of public officer or his bond for loss of public funds due to insolvency of bank in which they were deposited, 155 ALR 436. Constitutionality of statute appropriating money to reimburse public officer or employee for money paid or liability incurred by him in consequence of breach of duty, 155 ALR 1438. Personal liability of policeman, sheriff, or similar peace officer or his bond, for injury suffered as a result of failure to

enforce law or arrest lawbreaker, 41 ALR3d 700. Validity and construction of statute authorizing or requiring governmental unit to indemnify public officer or employee for liability arising out of performance of public duties, 71 ALR3d 90. Payment of attorney’s services in defending action brought against officials individually as within power or obligation of public body, 47 ALR5th 535.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Gwinnett Cnty. v. Blaney, 572 S.E.2d 553 (Ga. 2002).
Gwinnett Cnty. v. Blaney, 572 S.E.2d 553 (Ga. 2002). · cites it 2× “1 Pursuant to OCGA § 45-9-22, the Plan also provided for the payment of part or all of any claim or civil judgment rendered against any person whose defense Gwinnett County was authorized to undertake in accordance with the ordinance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.