Court review of commission orders and rules.

- Former Code 1933, § 93-211 (see O.C.G.A § 46-2-9) within itself did not give consent of the state to be sued. However, that section did indicate a construction of the powers and duties conferred by the General Assembly on the commission, and that the commission is subject to having its orders and rules reviewed by the courts. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 205 Ga. 863, 55 S.E.2d 618 (1949).

Former Code 1933, § 93-211 (see O.C.G.A § 46-2-9) recognizes right to judicial review of administrative orders, and must be construed as conferring that sort of right which furnishes the adequate and available remedy which meets the requirements of the Constitution. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 205 Ga. 863, 55 S.E.2d 618 (1949).

Jurisdiction of class action against commission vested in courts of Fulton County.

- Former Code 1933, § 93-211 (see O.C.G.A § 46-2-9) required that, in a class action brought against a utility to enjoin it from collecting new rates on electricity and to recover moneys already collected under a rate increase ordered by the Public Service Commission, no courts of the state other than those of Fulton County shall have jurisdiction. Riley v. Savannah Elec. & Power Co., 236 Ga. 802, 225 S.E.2d 301 (1976).