O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 47-2-26 (2019)

Designation of an actuary; duties of actuary; annual valuation of contingent assets and liabilities of the retirement system

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The board of trustees shall designate an actuary who shall be its technical adviser on matters regarding the operation of the funds created under this chapter and who shall perform such duties as are required in that regard. (b) At least every five years, the actuary shall conduct an actuarial investigation into the mortality, service, and compensation experience of the members and beneficiaries of the retirement system and shall recommend for adoption by the board of trustees mortality, service, and other tables needed in the operation of the system. Taking into account the results of such investigations, the board of trustees shall from time to time adopt for the retirement system such mortality, service, and other tables as it shall deem necessary for use in all calculations required in connection with this retirement system. The board of trustees shall also determine from

time to time the rate of regular interest to be used by the retirement system, which rate shall be limited to a minimum of 2 percent. (c) On the basis of the rate of regular interest and the tables last adopted by the board of trustees, the actuary shall make annual valuations of the contingent assets and liabilities of the retirement system.

History

(Ga. L. 1949, p. 138, § 6; Ga. L. 1971, p. 418, § 1; Ga. L. 1983, p. 637, § 1; Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 65/SB 436.)

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 2010, p. 1207, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: ‘‘The intent of this Act is to repeal obsolete and inoperative provisions and to make certain stylistic corrections in Title 47 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. Nothing in this Act shall deny, abridge, increase, renew, revive, or on any way affect any right, benefit, option, credit,

JUDICIAL DECISIONS (ERS) under the general grant of authority in O.C.G.A. § 47-2-21 and more specific grants of authority in O.C.G.A. §§ 47-2-26 and 47-2-28. Alverson v. Employees’ Ret. Sys., 272 Ga. App. 389, 613 S.E.2d 119 (2005). Cited in Ross v. Odom, 401 F.2d 464 (5th Cir. 1968).

Authority to determine service retirement benefits. - Neither O.C.G.A. § 47-2-120(a) nor O.C.G.A. § 47-2-110(a) provides a formula for the calculation of service retirement benefits; the authority to do so rests with the Board of Trustees of the Employees Retirement System of the State of Georgia

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL tions shall not be made while a member is not in service, it necessarily followed that the word ‘‘benefit’’ must be construed to mean ‘‘regular interest.’’ 1971 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 71-26.

No ‘‘regular interest’’ accrues while member not in service. - Since contributions and interest are all that accrue to an account of a member of the retirement system, and since Ga. L. 1959, p. 107, § 2 (see O.C.G.A. § 47-2-70(c)) expressly stated that contribu-

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2005–2005 · leading case: Alverson v. Employees' Ret. Sys., 613 S.E.2d 119 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005).
Alverson v. Employees' Ret. Sys., 613 S.E.2d 119 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “*394 Moreover, more specific grants of authority are found in OCGA §§ 47-2-26 (a) and 47-2-28 (a) and (b).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.