Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §48-13-59, enacted by Ga. L. 2000, p. 1325, § 4.)
- Trial court erred by dismissing a city's declaratory judgment action against several online travel companies for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the appellate court erred by affirming the dismissal as the issue of whether the city's ordinance allowing the city to collect a hotel occupancy tax from the online travel companies was a contested issue in the matter that neither lower court had determined. The legal question of whether the ordinance even applied to the online travel companies had to be determined before the city was required to submit to the administrative process set forth within the ordinance and the enabling statutes, O.C.G.A. § 48-13-50 et seq. City of Atlanta v. Hotels.com, L.P., 285 Ga. 231, 674 S.E.2d 898 (2009).
- Violation of O.C.G.A. § 48-13-59 is not an offense designated as one that requires fingerprinting. 2000 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 2000-11.
- Obligation of online travel companies to collect and remit hotel occupancy taxes, 61 A.L.R. 6th 387.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-06-15
Citation: 681 S.E.2d 122, 285 Ga. 684, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2013, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 315
Snippet: in particular OCGA §§ 48-13-58, 48-13-58.1, and 48-13-59, would not be effective in making the City whole
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-03-23
Citation: 674 S.E.2d 898, 285 Ga. 231, 9 Fulton County D. Rep. 1010, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 96
Snippet: civil and criminal penalties. OCGA §§ 48-13-58; 48-13-59. Under the Enabling Statutes, counties and cities